Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I agree that it's a very strange design decision on CA's part, considering that the settlements themselves are - from a game mechanics perspective - THE focal point of the entire region / province system. Your analogy with England and Brandenburg is pretty spot on. Then again, I am admittedly not too knowledgeable on this specific subject, so I always just assumed that maybe this is simply how provinces / prefectures are structured in Japan.
Ah, interesting. Well if that's the case, then CA did the reverse of what they should have done. Hovering over the province should give the province name while the settlement itself should be named after the provincial city. Having a town/ city named Musashi wouldn't make sense. That's like having the city of London named "England" or the city of Berlin named "Brandenburg".