安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
When a dupe is looking for food, you're adding a "lack of variety penalty" to his pathing logic if this food type has been eaten recently. So far so good. But this penalty seems to scale with the time since this food type was last eaten? In other words, a dupe is less likely to eat a food type the longer it's been since he's eaten it, so long as he's eaten it already within the MaxMealsCounted. That's weird, right?
I'm gonna give this a spin anyway. Might experiment with the PreferencePenaltyForEatenTypes setting; I'm curious how this variety logic will interact with (overshadow?) the regular food quality logic, since the morale diff is pretty small compared to quality-related morale. If this works it could make the food metagame a lot more interesting, I think.
thank you for your service yet again