Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Technically you are correct but there is confusion over the precise definition of a cataphract; the term Cataphract just refers to a horse and rider that is fully clad in scale armor.
Byzantium military strategy and equipment evolved from antiquity to medieval era. For instance Stirrups were introduced from the Avars but full plate armor never made it because after after the 4th Crusade the Empire lost access to the resources that allowed it to maintain the best army in Europe.
Regardless Byzantium still had much of the resources and power of the Roman Empire and could field large professsionaly trained and well equipped armies. Therefore they deserve to have a UU that can dominate the 30-40 turns that comprises the early medieval period.
Yes sigmacraft is right. I chose that picture simply because I could not find any other picture that presented what Byzantine Cataphracts may have looked like and Tolkiens vision of Gondor while not intentionally allegorical did portray the people of Minas Tirith as a high cultured, educated and wealthy medieval society. The only European society that can meet that category in the middle ages is Byzantium.