Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It was rebutting the argument that the Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment for manual (and later, semi-automatic) guns such as muskets, flintlock rifles, shotguns, and things used up to the Napoleanic Wars.
This weapon right here was considered a prototype to the machine gun (which was superceded nearly a century later by the more successful Gatling Gun). The argument was that this item was something the Framers were very aware of, and they considered technological progress when writing the Second Amendment to the Constitution.