Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Did you know 459,200 Americans die every year under the Pile Through Act? lol.
Should it be lower? Definitely. Does it need to be lower? Not really :)
On the population point you're probably right but I wanted something to simulate the fatalities such a policy would cause, especially when unrestricted: the raw numbers are set for each country and the "Population" statistic adjusts it (though I am not sure exactly under which equation - if you know a way to look at the current population count during gameplay let me know).
Two points: 1. the population impact value is scaled with the Environment Protests so that population drop reduces as the regularity of the protests subside - a lot of effects are at their peak when protests are in effect, I did this so it is a more coherent policy. 2. The overall impact is super low. We are talking -1.5% at most initially, and -0.1 to -0.5% after a few turns nothing that disrupts gameplay, the logic there being that criminals & politicians are misusing the law to try and get away with hitting people with their cars.