Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I like this theory, especially since it seems implausible that the Germanic people would be completely devoid of artistic craftsmanship during mid antiquity, given they've been around as long as the Celts. For example: The beautiful spangenhelms we see during late antiquity HAD to have evolved from something rather than thin-air or imitation. Yes, it's true that the Germans utilized Roman and Persian armour, the former usually through raids, and the latter through trade and learning the techniques. However, you can clearly see their artistic and cultural influence on them, as the designs and metal work is unique to those 2 cultures, rather than blatant rip-offs.
Tl;dr: The whole "ancient germans were dumb barbarians with no creativity" claim is stupid to me