Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The goal then is not to take out all of Australia's land, but just to force a capitulation. Taking out Melbourne and Sydney is all you really need, there's some value in taking Southern Qld but not much. Taking out Sydney and Melbourne would be the fastest way to ensure some sort of surrender as that is where the majority of the civilian population lived (a much higher proportion than today too). The US would not be able to commit all their forces to take out all of Australia, so would just focus on major targets like Melbourne, Sydney (and for some reason Perth... maybe ports?) and not care about anything beyond that.
2/2
In a confrontation between the US and UK, Australia would only be invaded under extraordinary circumstances. The US plan (called War Plan Red) was to defeat Canada and then take it from there, with the possibility of naval invasions onto places like Australia to keep their Pacific colonies safe. 'War Plan Scarlet' was the plan to invade Australia (after taking out New Zealand in Auckland and destroying opposing naval presence) either starting at Syndey or Melbourne, and then driving by land to the other. Afterwards, the plan was to invade Perth, and that's it - Qld is not really a factor. Not enough people or military institution. At most, it would be a secondary front to Sydney to secure the flank.
1/2