Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thank you.
The AI ran well with no collisions, but the Voyager should start 3 minutes earlier and 2H47 1 minute earlier. With those adjustments the scenario runs even better.
Thanks for sharing this and drawing our attention to this route extension and of course the "missing link" of the VTEC AP Class 91.It well deserves a "thumbs up" from me.
I found the BH reskin thanks and finally got it to work in full testing. I discovered the geopcdx file mapping for the DVT was incorrect for the nd version ( it is not required here though ) , It was looking in a folder "VTEC_AP" rather than "VTEC" ! This is important if someone trys to use this skin on a "down" train. Off to try the scenario now. Thanks.
https://www.bluecode.org.uk/catalog/ts/reskins/electric/class-91-vtec-virgin-trains-east-coast-livery-reskin/