antitoxic
デッドユニコーン   Tokyo, Japan
 
 
No information given.
Currently Offline
Recent Activity
3,101 hrs on record
last played on May 21
38 hrs on record
last played on May 14
1,188 hrs on record
last played on May 14
移動 Nov 8, 2023 @ 4:42am 
bot
Thor baros May 18, 2023 @ 6:32am 
-rep stupid ♥♥♥♥♥♥ doesn t know how to play
antitoxic Apr 6, 2023 @ 4:41am 
"spacecraft engineer"
antitoxic Apr 6, 2023 @ 4:41am 
can't talk to you, you blocked me :steamfacepalm:
Apr 6, 2023 @ 4:07am 
^exactly, as I said, you trust non reliable sources and you keep copying stuff from the sources. Like I told you ingame, get a grip and start discussing with some logic instead of copypasting irrelevant stuff. Thank you.
antitoxic Apr 6, 2023 @ 3:44am 
read this :
I would not say that tests "measure logic": the fact is that logic is always unambiguous, that's its whole point. There is a certain set of facts from which absolutely unambiguous conclusions follow (there cannot be two solutions, there cannot be a "non-standard" solution, logic is always unambiguous, this is its power and meaning).
Items on an IQ test usually involve finding patterns in the given data: such items can have different solutions depending on the reasoning of the solver.

Let's give an example: let's say in the task they are asked to continue a series of numbers:

3 5 7 ?

the correct answer is most likely 3 5 7 9 (each next number is 2 more than the previous one).

We have Vasya, who writes "3 5 7 are odd prime numbers. The next odd prime number will be 11. The correct answer is 3 5 7 11". Why is Vasya wrong? Why is his rationale worse?

The LOGIC task does not allow different interpretations of the condition. IQ tests allow 2v31