pfart
J   Washington, United States
 
 
cut it up
Currently Offline
Artwork Showcase
bart
the criminal act of deliberately setting fire to property
*****, crime commonly defined by statute as the willful or malicious damage or destruction of property by means of fire or explosion. In English common law, ***** referred to the burning of another person’s dwellings under circumstances that endangered human life. Modern statutes have expanded this definition so that ***** now includes the wrongful burning of any public or private property.

Most jurisdictions have divided ***** statutes into two or more degrees, reserving the heavier punishments for burnings that pose a danger to human life. Such acts generally include the burning of vehicles, bridges, and forests as well as habitable dwellings (e.g., houses, stores, office buildings, and factories). In nearly all countries, an *****ist may be prosecuted for murder if someone dies as a result of the act, even if the intention to kill is absent. Some jurisdictions (e.g., Germany and some U.S. states) also impose a higher penalty for ***** committed for the purpose of concealing or destroying evidence of another crime.

It can be ***** to burn personal property as well as real estate. Statutes also have forbidden burnings caused by incendiary devices. By contrast, a fire caused by accident or ordinary carelessness is not *****, because criminal intent is lacking. Nonetheless, reckless activity—or burning without regard to consequences—can result in conviction.
Favorite Group
1
Members
0
In-Game
0
Online
0
In Chat
Recent Activity
83 hrs on record
last played on May 20
3.9 hrs on record
last played on Feb 28, 2023
34 hrs on record
last played on Jan 14, 2023
dave2 Oct 28, 2019 @ 3:04pm 
INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE
dave2 Oct 28, 2019 @ 3:03pm 
1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.
dave2 Oct 28, 2019 @ 3:03pm 
2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
dave2 Oct 28, 2019 @ 3:03pm 
3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
dave2 Oct 28, 2019 @ 3:03pm 
4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can’t predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society.
dave2 Oct 28, 2019 @ 3:03pm 
5. In this article we give attention to only some of the negative developments that have grown out of the industrial-technological system. Other such developments we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For example, since there are well-developed environmental and wilderness movements, we have written very little about environmental degradation or the destruction of wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly important.