Последние обзоры [FG]Soulreaper317

Fix the Economy. The game has potential but you took a huge ♥♥♥♥ on it with the insane economy.

This Game beats everything in it's category. From a base building / automation / logistics perspective, this is the best it gets. Satisfactory comes in second place for me. For as much better as Satisfactory is in terms of visuals / world etc, it doesn't go anywhere close to the flow that this game has.

Personally i think this is what matters in a game like this: how smooth is the building experience, and this game has just that. Pure building made easy and intuitive from the start, no weird struggles, no lack of copy paste, no need to rework something 1000 times because of an upgrade, no need to do weird tasks etc. It's pure math and how good you are at actually building and calibrating the flow which can be EASILY seen by how full the output belts are. Easy to learn, hard to master; simply perfect!

TLDR: Idea seemed nice, execution is horrible. Don't bother with this one 4/10 for graphics and concept.

I get where all the positivity comes from since it's a "one of a kind" but it's so bad in so many places... The only reason why this scored as high as it did was only because there were so few people playing it / that got it in the first place.


Detailed points:

1. Combat is nice as a concept but it's a cheese fest that ends up pretty much in spamming the same crap. It's like they tried to replicate the Arkham Asylum games and failed miserably. If you want a block/ dash fest just go play Elden Ring or any other souls like game since they did it properly or if you want to actually play this game as it should of been gameplay wise, get Batman Arkham Asylum/City.

2. Environments are nice and so are the graphics but it's unreal behind it all so there's no surprise.

3. The story is brain bleeding bad: just an intro, no context, no background, no absolute nothing. It feels like a plain lame arena game in different scenarios/environments. There is no development, no build up, straight up no sense. I think they wanted to do something like returnal and also failed badly copying that as well.

4. The camera work is some of THE WORST i've seen in all my 40.000+ hours of gaming. I didn't think anything could beat Resident Evil 5/6 but this game went above and beyond. Just absolutely 0/10. Bad angles, bad mouse forcing, bad combat visual, bad everything. The only single time it works is when they made the 2D sections and i swear if they would of just kept this game 2D it would of actually been so much better. All they had to do was add proper FOV and proper distance from the character but somehow they totally messed it up.

5. Cheesy ass map design. It's one of these games that you get stuff later in the game that opens stuff for sections earlier in the game and i hate that. That concept belongs in games like Darksiders or God of War etc. not this crap.

So yeah all and all extremely disappointing. There are other games that do what this one does way better in all aspects.

Attention Helldivers,

The Automaton spies have been dealt with. We can finally resume operations. Democracy has prevailed.

This has a great CORE for a truly revolutionary game. HOWEVER due to early build you might want to wait if you want a smooth experience.

Pros:

1. Missions and the concept of doing them in a "persistent world" is perfect. It would be perfect if the missions could also be generated in the future and not just "streamlined". Hostages situations and alive civilian extract could also be amazing.

2. Great map setup allowing players to focus on both PVP and PVE as they please. It would be perfect if in the future they add area warning for players that try to grief the spawns. As in: all faction sees a 100 meter red circle on the map if players from the other faction join the first cities. This needs to be done in order to keep the experience grief clean.

3. Damage system. Ok this might be taken from Tarkov but it works perfectly well and gives a super good sense of danger and requires brain to actually stitch up.

4. Graphics are GREAT. It will obviously improve with new drivers and optimizations but this reminds me of ghost recon wildlands so much and i love it.


Cons:

1. Everything that has to do with early access like lag, AI being a bit stupid, bullet sponging /not registering etc., NPC spawns, missing keybindings and generally all the stuff which is fixed as the early access moves forward.


To end this review i just want to say that this formula over here was made by someone who understands Arma 3, Tarkov and Ghost Recon. If they cook this right this could be the Baldur's Gate 3 of the FPS world.

DO NOT disappoint us please :)

Don't waste your time on this one. At least not yet. This game has an extremely high probability of dying out within 1 year if they don't change direction on some core aspects.


Here is a list of a few MAJOR ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥:

1. They learned absolutely NOTHING from the beta. Classes are more unbalanced than ever, and running 3 heavy or 2 heavy and 1 medium is simply devastating. They should of forced 1 light 1 med and 1 heavy / team in all matches.

2. Every character looks retarded. I have no idea who came up with the "design" for that sad excuse of a player model but it was probably a Karen with blue hair. The skins and models are nothing short of nightmare material.

3. Game is full with cheaters already. There is 0 anti-cheat present and even the most blatant hack goes through without issues.

4. There are random micro-lags and ping spikes. Even on an extremely high rig you will notice these issues quite frequently. Game is not optimized and has some major issues that will need to be fixed sooner or later.

5. Why are there asian players on EU servers?! Why is this game NOT region locked based on IP? Yes i know you can bypass that with a VPN but at least it will force people to go an extra mile. Having Asian bots in half of all games is not fun for anyone especially when they are almost all cheating.

6. The UI is the worst UI i have seen in 20+years of gaming and 1k+ titles I've played. Never in my life have I seen such a bad management of menu, friend list, load-outs, and literally EVERYTHING ELSE that can be considered UI.



Things this game does right:

1. Environment destruction is nice and feels fresh. That's it. That is the only thing this game does right. Feels more like a demo environment of explosion spam-fests rather than a game imho but that's just me.

This masterpiece represents everything a true gamer could ever hope for. The only pity is that this level of quality demands talent and creativity, and we all know these traits are severely lacking in the gaming industry today.

Enjoy this gem, and remember that you lived in a moment when history was made.

Sadly this game had the worst possible start and by no means it managed to deliver a redemption arc like "No Man's Sky" but it has one of the greatest stories and universe out there.


The good:

1. Game finally works after years of development. Even tho this version of the game which is called 2.X feels like a 1.X (how the game SHOULD OF came out) i am willing to judge it in an overall positive manner (even tho bugs are still present)

2. There are some soundtracks which are downright masterworks. Certain segments are absolutely stunning.

3. Class system is working a lot better now. Some builds are super strong tho. I feel like they could of been polished a little more.

4. Graphics and cut-scene animation is Top level. We are talking above and beyond. If Baldur's Gate 3 raised the standard for RPG games, Cyberpunk raised the standard for animation, interaction and overall incredibly solid graphic compartment.


The Bad:

1. The game is made to really have 1 single ending. Yes i am aware there are around 8 different endings but only 1 max 2 really make sense. Sadly this is where the game took an insane hit for me. Game is meant to be played as Male V. The story arcs favor that over the female variant. The only ending that was crafted to 100% is the one with Panam. Everything else is beyond half baked at best. Doesn't have the same level of engagement, backstory, emotional impact, actual game missions/segments, nada. It's male V and Panam, nothing else. And even though this is considered the best ending it's still sad as ♥♥♥♥ in the end. HOWEVER if you are male V with Panam and do not choose her ending you will be hit in the face extremely hard (especially with phantom liberty main ending "the Tower")

2. The Phantom Liberty endings are an absolute psychological trauma. I will not spoil anything but i will only say that all 4 are extremely bad (not as in badly crafted but extremely bad/depressing outcomes)

3. Phantom Liberty was crafted in a way that it pushes you to betray songbird in a crucial mission. Only if you do that you will have access to a really big chunk of a mission otherwise inaccessible. Badly enough, this mission is the ONLY ONE in the game that has the "Alien VS Predator" Mechanic. It is a segment which cannot be encountered in any other way and it is really well done and panic inducing. Again, even in this case the choice ramification was half baked. Feels like the other endings could of had more work.

4. Cyber-Psycho missions. Fun to play against but wasted potential. Could of been so much more than just boss-fights. Huge missed opportunity.

5. The intro to the game is the only segment where Cyberpunk gives 100%. The missions you do with Jackie are basically the best they get in terms of ramifications and overall care & craft. Rest of the game is rather on rails. Huge, HUGE wasted opportunities. You can see that every main mission outside of the intro segment was basically a "Draft" that was just kinda left there (again) half baked. They still work, don't get me wrong, but having played the intro, everything else left a bitter taste.

6. Game is too easy. Even on Max difficulty game is a joke compared to how it was pre 2.0. And while i get that some segments pre 2.0 were almost impossible, i kinda feel sad for blazing through everything with no stealth needed what so ever (except for specific gigs in which it was mandatory).


There are so many more things to cover but i would go into too many spoilers. I hope that for future games they will not pull another ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up launch like this one so here's to Hoping!

I have no idea how Valve managed this level of ♥♥♥♥ up but they did.


Verdict: Absolute Trash/10


Just to list a few points:

1. Achievement removal from CS:GO
2. Constant lags on extremely high end PC Rigs
3. Rampant cheating from day 1. Aimbot/Wallhacks on at least 50% of all players i spectated.
4. Horrible UI. How you managed to break a perfect UI that worked flawlessly for 15 years is beyond me.
5. Missing maps / Modes and an infinity of content that was generated during the years.
6. Issues with matchmaking. You are insane to think ELO ranking can work in FPS games or ANY games outside of chess or 1 v 1 strategy titles (starcraft etc.). Your system never worked, it will never work, and the only thing it causes is toxicity between players.

Don't bother, this game needs at least 5 more years to actually fix the ♥♥♥♥ it created in this version.

(текст обзора скрыт)