https://x.com/atomicfabrik/status/1824349264064995660 (Post was deleted on August 20th, please refer to the archive made here: https://archive.is/k86F0 )

https://steamcommunity.com/groups/Sentinels_of_the_Store/discussions/0/6929437211298063222/

NOTE: I apologise for the length of this article. I have provided a TL; DR here as I go over a lot of points that Cristian raises that aren't all that important, and I want to make sure focus is still given to some topics that get buried quite a lot both here and in his initial X post.

• Cristian starts off insulting me and the group.
  
• Cristian shares a conspiracy that we receive funding from competitors, and that our game developer admin and moderator are only in their positions to crush competition on Steam - despite the fact one not having any games on Steam and one having only worked in a contractual capacity on other games and having none of his own on Steam. And also, despite the fact they are in it for the same moral and ethical reasoning I and others are involved.
  
• Cristian literally claims to know absolutely everything about Steam but shows a lack of awareness of rule changes in circa. 2018, and misinterprets other rules throughout the post.
  
• Cristian uses a lot of strawman argument attempts, using unrelated argument points to falsely claim different arguments are being made.
  
• Cristian falsely claims Steam keys are capped at 5,000. Your requests go unchecked up to 5,000 but Steam start manually reviewing requests that exceed this number...wonder why he didn't want to go over 5,000?
  
• Cristian claims that we'll see greater traffic and get more views because of this, when me and Cristian are internet nobodies and neither of us will benefit off the other.
  
• Cristian presents a strawman argument regarding the MasterChef game of his. He claims that AI images are allowed on Steam where the issue was instead regarding the fact he had AI images with 0 gameplay screenshots, another Steam rule he either conveniently ignores or isn't aware of.
  
• Claims it's Valve's fault his games were priced so high, while ignoring the point that he chose to price these high to qualify them for Jee Two Ayy bundles.
  
• Cristian argues that asset flips are allowed on Steam, when no one was ever trying to say they weren't: another strawman argument point. These issues were raised on ethical standards, not on a legality or rule-based scenario.
  
• Cristian claims my cited 59 (he cites 58 as I updated the count only after his post) games of his remaining on Steam is inaccurate as they sold a lot of apps off to publishers, however I knowingly deducted games that were known to have been sold off to publishers like Conglomerate 5.
  
• Cristian admits to faking reviews but tries to argue that other developers do it too.... which to him means it's okay.
  
• Cristian goes on a large tangent about why people pay VAT on shopping after they already paid tax on earnings...I feel he just brings these points up to intentionally confuse people to distract from the genuine points.
  
• Claims he got no message from Steam that his games were banned - despite him openly admitting he was partaking in activity that was against rules. You knew yourself Cristian you were violating rules for years, you don't need Steam to tell you that.
  
• He makes a genuine point about how it’s unfair how inconsistent review manipulation is enforced - which I 100% agree with him on.
  
• He makes a vague warning at the end saying I need to be watchful as the group gets bigger in case someone doesn't just stop at just a message on the internet(?)
  
• He ends the post off saying a percentage of their Steam sales ended up going to children's health charities - good if this is the case, I suggest he take up philanthropy in his new career path.

This morning, Atomic Fabrik, AKA Cristian Manolachi posted on X and our forums a response to a few people, but notably it's a response to Steam with regards to his ban and to this group and me. I thought it'd be fun to break down what is in my opinion a terrible response, go over this, what Atomic Fabrik calls, a "clarification message" and talk about some of its contents.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

The first thing that comes to mind when you see a group of just 3,000 people over 7 years who only criticize the same individuals is that this group was created and funded by competitors, and the moderators of this group do this for financial compensation. Mature people who have a normal life usually don’t have free time, being busy with their jobs, family life, children, etc.

I find it amazing that this is his opening point. In full fairness to Cristian, there are some points that are better than others in this, but he opens with just a terrible, near childish attempt of an insult. Criticise the same individuals? I mean, sure, some familiar faces crop up, but go all the way back to our articles in 2017 and you'll see we've talked about a myriad of different developers. Even with Cristian here, I've only ever wrote 2 articles about him. 3 including this one.

His accusation the group was created and funded by competitors is very laughable, saying the moderators do it for financial compensation.

Let me talk about our funding/finances over the years:

• We had no revenue streams for the group until July 2019 when we joined the Humble Bundle Partner Program
  
• Across 5 years, our Humble Bundle affiliate has generated $623.69 (funny number)
  
• We have a Patreon that we launched in September 2023, however no payouts have been made due to us not meeting the threshold for Patreon's partner payout service Payoneer, in which you need to have made $50 before a payout can be made.
  
• Our Patreon generates $4/month
  
• Across the Patreon's lifetime of nearly 1 year, it has generated $44.91, all of which is still in holding until we reach $50
  
• My administrator and moderators are not paid for the work that they do.
  
• All funds I have generated from Sentinels I have in an account for any further developmental projects we want to do, so far these funds have only gone towards the purchase of a domain to a hopeful Sentinels website, and to our charity fundraising campaigns.

So, across the 7.5 years that this group has been around, it's generated in total $668.60, which translates to roughly $89.15/year or $7.42/month. Even discarding that this funding is being used for reinvestment and charity work and not leisure activities, I think it's safe to say I'm not bathing in money, and neither are my moderators.

His claim that we're competitors I believe is stemming from the fact that my administrator Ratchet and moderator Occular Malice are game developers, and that Cristian believes that their involvement with the group is solely to destroy competition. First off, I'd advise Cristian not to flatter yourself and think that your games are on a par with these guys' work, I personally would never consider you competition to their games. Second, Ratchet does not head up his own development company. He is a programmer and doesn't profit off direct game sales. The only games that he is the sole developer of aren't available on Steam, but instead on Itch[ratchet3789.itch.io]. Thirdly, Occular Malice is in a similar boat, he hosts no games on Steam, all of his library is isolated to his own website[simstools.com]. Your performance on Steam Cristian holds nothing to these guys. These guys are on my mod team because they're friends of mine, I trust them, and they share the same values as me where developers shouldn't be partaking in the same practices that people like you have revelled in.

To cap it off as well, the argument I've heard thrown around time and time again, saying "mature normal people don't have free time, are busy with jobs, family life and children to bother with a Steam group. You mustn't have a life, lol!" Well believe it or not, I juggle those as well (not the children part yet though.) So much so that these matters were the reasoning behind me taking leave from the group for almost a year in 2022/23. This is my hobby, it's a hobby that I find rewarding, and the funny fact is I've made it so it doesn't actually take up a lot of my time so that it does work around my other responsibilities. The 3,000+ members here have also made our coverage easier, as it never has to be one person researching into a topic, and people can chime in as and where they can. This isn't down to one person having a lot of time on their hands, it's a collective effort from individuals driven by a desire to uphold morals, values and ethics all having pockets of time that they can contribute.

Originally posted by AtomicFabrik:

3,000 people out of over 100 million players is nothing, meaning the contribution of this group is negligible.

Reading this, I'm reminded of a quote from Margaret Mead, an American cultural anthropologist. "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." Just pretend that Margaret said "Steam" instead of "the world" back in the 1960s.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

There are also tens of thousands of games on Steam, and these 250 games that were deleted are also insignificant.

The guy is making it sound like the life achievement of the group is to get every game taken down from Steam. He's measuring the supposed "success" of the group in a numerical sense of how many games get booted from Steam. That's never been the point. If I lived in the most idealistic world, I would love to see in every situation where I've covered scenarios like theft, review manipulation, whatever, the developer goes "oh shit, sorry, I didn't know this wasn't allowed" remove the infringing content, game doesn't get banned, customers have the option of getting the game if they want, game developers make money, everybody's happy. I get nothing for games getting removed off Steam. I got nothing for when you got your games removed. What matters more in the instance with you is you've been made an example of and been shown as a reminder of what happens when people break the rules and get carried away in their own little get rich quick scheme.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

Let’s say you have a well-paid job, a happy family, and after work, you have nothing else to do, so you create this group instead of focusing on more important matters (family life, career, health, investments, etc.). Let’s assume it’s a “volunteer” thing, and you’ll say that in one way or another, we need to distance ourselves from developers/companies of this kind because, in your view, they tarnish the store’s image, create scams/spam/etc., and in the end, your effort paid off by deleting 250 games and giving this group a bit more visibility (which is a very good marketing trick).

Shit, sorry guys, instead of doing this group I should have been out exercising, finding a 4th job on top of my other 3, banging my girlfriend and looking at the stock market.

Like wtf is the point of this? All your worst arguments are at the beginning and book end of your post. All your more genuine arguments are buried in a vacuous sea of meandering points, misinformation and conspiracies.

And let me just make one thing clear. I am not responsible for you being banned. Sentinels of the Store is not responsible for you being banned. Fireb0rn, BaityBait and any of the other YouTuber that made videos about you are not responsible for you being banned. This is a key issue when it comes to banned developers, they look outwards. They look at who can take blame instead of looking at what has been the commonality in the steps that have led to them getting to where they are today: themselves. None of us made you Cristian, spam Steam with over 250 games. None of us made you place your games into Jee Two Ayy bundles. None of us made you buy fake reviews. You did all of that yourself. Just own up to it, accept it, and understand the only person responsible for your downfall is yourself.

Really if you think about it, if you didn't take part in any of this activity in the first place, none of our coverage would exist. If no developers ever did any of the stupid shit we talk about, then this group would cease to exist. If you don't want our coverage to continue, then check in with yourself first, and simply put, don't give us a reason to talk about you.

Originally posted by AtomicFabrik:

The question is, what changed after deleting 250 games out of tens of thousands? In reality, you didn’t change anything at all. There are thousands of games from my competitors/foreign developers that have bought reviews, “break the rules,” are sold on G2A, and so on—the business continues exactly as it did before.

Again, we don't need to retread on old ground where we've already discussed his measuring means of getting all games removed from Steam. If you're also aware of any developers writing fake reviews, buying reviews, breaking the rules, or partaking in G2A scams, I would greatly advise you to make a discussion thread here and/or send an email. It'd be a great redemption arc for you if you assist with sorting through other developers partaking in actions similar. Ata Berdiyev did this for a short while after he got booted on Steam sending me details on other Steam scams, and the fact that you've put this offer on the table is very reassuring. I look forward to your future whistleblowing.

Originally posted by AtomicFabrik:

Speaking of rules, you say we’re breaking the rules. Which rules, the ones that Steam itself implemented? Why did Steam remove Greenlight and in 2017 put in place Steam Direct where, for $100, you can publish absolutely anything you want? Have you ever wondered? Why did Epic Games start with a limited number of games/with a very careful selection of games, and this year, they are transforming into exactly the same business model as Steam, where you pay $100, and the game is greenlit in the store? Why? Because it’s much more profitable for them, and this business model hasn’t changed since 2017...and we are just following the rules, that’s all.

This is a lengthy strawman argument. Atomic Fabrik is trying to imply here that the games' poor quality was the reason for removal. The rules Atomic Fabrik has violated are printed in black and white, you can't artificially inflate the reviews of your game, your screenshots must only contain gameplay which Atomic Fabrik violated with their more recent blunder of swapping out all of their gameplay screenshots on Masterchef out to AI generated pictures[steamdb.info], which might I add conveniently happened just 1 day before the ban. None of these are rules regarding the games' quality. In addition, the Steam "publish anything you want with Steam Direct" idea he talks about as having been unchanged since 2017 was also walked back following the near releases of games like Active Shooter[www.bbc.co.uk] and Rape Day[www.bbc.co.uk] and there was then a massive asterisk next to that supposed "anything". You can read more about this following their change in stance via a blog post in June 2018, and a second in March 2019. But you know, Cristian would know of this post's existence, since he knows everything about Steam.

https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/1666776116200553082

https://steamcommunity.com/games/593110/announcements/detail/1808664240304050758

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

Also, around 2018, Steam limited the number of keys requested, from unlimited to about 50,000, and then, if I remember correctly, about two years later, they limited it to 5,000 keys per game. So, when you accuse us of selling through bundles/G2A/etc., we are just following the platform’s rules.

I think Atomic Fabrik is trying to claim here that due to Steam limiting features on their platform to developers further, that this led to them facilitating a culture which led to Atomic Fabrik going to those websites. If this is the argument, then this can be rebutted by the fact that Steam put those limits on key generations as a direct means to combat scam developers[gameworldobserver.com].

Originally posted by Steam:

If you request an extreme number of keys and you are not offering Steam customers a comparable deal, or if your sole business is selling Steam Keys and not offering value to Steam customers, your request may be denied and you may lose the privilege to request keys

And may I also point out that Steam don't just stop you from generating more than 5,000 keys, their rules say that they will review further generations on a case by case basis, which is effectively an inspection to ensure that these keys are being used for genuine means. Unfortunately, this is yet another lie aimed to deceive readers of this post. The only reason you would be limited to 5,000 keys would be if you were doing business with people that you shouldn't be doing business with, or if Steam have reasons to be suspicious. Or maybe Cristian just took this number as his cap as he didn't want Steam to get suspicious of him, and as such, never wanted to exceed 5,000 for fears Steam would catch on to what he was using the keys for. Valve needing to manually review his request may very well could have generated suspicion. At best, this is just a lack of knowledge on Cristian's part, however, he boldly stated earlier in the post that after 10+ years he knows "absolutely everything about it (Steam)" so with that bold claim we'll have to assume malice with the intent to deceive with that piece of inaccurate information.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

anyway, thanks to you, I need to find a job xD, but somehow you should still thank me, @SteamSentinels , because based on this message, you’ll get traffic/views.)

You're a nobody. You have 1,000 followers on Twitter. You're not internet famous, I'm a nobody too, we're all nobodies. You and I are only known to people that are already members of this group, or the Spanish YouTube community. We aren't talking about you for the sake of piggy backing off your world-renowned internet success. If you go out on the street right now and ask random strangers if they know me and/or you, they're going to stare at you and ask what an "Atomic Mellow" is. Nobody knows who we are, and nobody gives a shit, it's a tough pill to swallow, but we both better take it quick.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

Let’s get back to some other accusations: AI-generated images. There’s a recently implemented rule allowing us to use AI for logos, as long as we indicate it in some form on Steamworks.

Another strawman argument!

We never at any point said you couldn't have AI generated images. What we have said, as we've reiterated, is you can't just have exclusively AI generated images with no gameplay screenshots, as emphasised in the Steamworks documentation that you clearly know inside and out with your 10 years Steam experience.

Originally posted by AtomicFabrik:

Games priced at $50/100/200$. The question for the whole group: Do we, Atomic Fabrik, approve these prices? No, we follow the rules, and someone at Steam approves them, that’s all. So far, we have followed the rules and worked in tandem with the platform.

Another strawman argument.

Atomic Fabrik is indicating that there's some sort of rule that Steam has with regards to pricing of games, that Atomic is claiming we're accusing him of violating. This is also not the case. The price point of his games has also been an annoyance, but also been linked to the Jee Two Ayy bundle scheme to place them into platinum bundles to deceive users they are getting high priced and highly rated (where the review manipulation comes into the scheme) games, where its shovelware titles being manipulated through Steam's tools to appear in those bundles. Having a high-priced game isn't against the rules, he's right, but baring the reasoning behind the pricing of the games in mind, the reasoning is heavily frowned upon and is also deceptive.

At this point, you may have noticed Atomic Fabrik talking a lot about "the rules." Relying on the rules to not tell him he can't do something. However, as has already been shown, there are some cases where he says "the rules don't say I can't do this" when they in fact do, or he's using it as his best line of defence with morals, ethics, and consumer trust being discarded. This is a heavy disconnect that is apparent throughout his post.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

You also accused us of asset flips. Is there a rule that prohibits this? No. Why is it allowed and overlooked? Go back to 2017, and you’ll find the answer. If this was a problem, do you think it wouldn’t have been approved for release by the Steam team? By the way, we collaborated with many developers from whom we bought Unity source codes, which we later sold to other companies. So, many of the games are ours.

He's right on this. His games were asset flips. Yes, asset flips are allowed on Steam. I don't have an issue with this. I don't think there should be a no asset flips rule, as I feel something like that is hard to define, difficult to enforce, and makes no sense. Let developers use assets, let the customer make the decision themselves on if they want to buy it or not. If developers are sticking to Steam's rules, which our friend Cristian here fails to do, I hold no issue with this.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

Another point, you say that 58 of our games haven’t been banned yet. We have operated as both a developer and publisher. There are games where certain companies asked us to handle promotion/marketing. The others are games where we were privately contacted to sell the rights to these games, so even if they were ours, they now belong to other publishers who have absolutely no connection with us and legally purchased them

I'd be curious to see if Atomic Fabrik looked over the games I alleged were still his that were on Steam. Are games such as these not yours anymore and sold off when they still list only your name and no one else?

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1531720/Need_for_Drive__Open_World_Multiplayer_Racing/

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1568180/USA_Truck_Simulator/

I was fully aware several Atomic Fabrik titles were sold off to other publishers, which is why I intentionally didn't include any games on the curated list from the likes of Conglomerate 5. App sales to other publishers were not included in the count, and 59 games were still returned as still being owned under Atomic Fabrik.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

Regarding reviews, we are not the first or last—many games do this, a very large percentage, and I know what I’m talking about—things that the platform knows but stricter rules aren’t implemented to stop it. Why? I won’t say everything :)

Yes, this is correct, there are a many cases of review manipulation, and I even agree with Cristian here that Valve's enforcement on review manipulation is not consistent, nor strong enough, and seems to conveniently lessen the enforcement on games that make money. Valve are very quick and happy to boot shovelware titles for partaking in review manipulation, but aren't so quick when it's titles that are generating substantial money, or released in Steam China, in which the review manipulation just gets flagged as off topic review activity. I think there does need to be fairer enforcement and more consistency, and I have previously and will continue to try and push this matter.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

And even if I repeat myself, there was much talk online about random keys. We followed the rules exactly, and if you find it strange or had other expectations, ask your own STATE where you live, which is the biggest scammer. Why do you tolerate that from your salary, you pay taxes, then with the salary you receive after taxes (about 60%), you go to the store and buy products with taxed money, for which you pay taxes again (VAT, etc.), and the store owner pays taxes on money that has been taxed twice...Why don’t you revolt? Because you know you won’t change anything.

He really loves strawman arguments and tangents doesn't he? It just comes so out of left field. What does me paying tax on my groceries have to do with you selling Steam keys in Jee Two Ayy bundles?

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

I’ve never been the type to respond to criticism or make a big fuss on the internet, but when you work with such a serious/prestigious platform for 10 years, and we’ve adapted to the rules, how fair is it to wake up one morning with no message from them, no warning, and simply have your work/effort and time erased without even a reply?

Let's be real Cristian, you stopped caring about what you released years ago. I'm even willing to believe you when you say that you started out putting effort in your games, because even in your earlier work there's a quality difference. You know that you stopped caring about the games you were releasing, you even show this in your post where you only ask for the games you made up to 2020 to be reinstated, you're not proud, nor are you happy about the games you've churned out the last 4 years. For the last 4 years, you've only cared about gaming the system, stretching the rules, maximising profitability and you didn't care what happened to your reputation along the way. That's why you haven't responded until now, because up till this point, everything people like me, Fireb0rn, Sentinels members and others have been saying, while critical of you never affected your bottom line. Now, your games are gone from Steam and that's been the only instigation to you churning out this response. Only now do you care and only now are you rolling back on what you've done these past 4 years, because if you spoke about the criticisms earlier, it would do nothing more but fan the flames and you'd be drawing more attention to it, which you didn't want to do, because you knew it would just attract more attention to you, which you didn't want because you knew you were in the wrong. It's the same reason why you didn't want to exceed the 5,000 key threshold, you didn't want Steam to see what you were doing. I would have more respect for this post, if there was some self-reflection, and admittance, but the words, the timing, what you talk about, reeks that you know, and you have always known that what you've been doing has been against Steam rules. You knew addressing this earlier would risk your games getting banned. Now that they have, you've got nothing to lose. In your instance, Steam didn't need to give you warning, you've known for years you've been partaking in practice that would get you banned, and I've shown here and in other pieces what you've been doing violates the rules that you claim you're so familiar with.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

And as for our games, did we force anyone to buy them? Everyone makes that decision independently—if you want it, buy it; if not, move on.

The fifth strawman argument. Please do find me a post where someone claims they were forced to buy them, or a user alleging people are forced to buy them. What I will say is people got deceived into buying them, the sheer fact that you used AI images not reflective of the game with no gameplay trailers in one instance I'd chalk up to deception, and the fact you participated in dodgy Jee Two Ayy dealings meant that users didn't know what they were getting.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

P.S. A good piece of advice for this group. The first day was perhaps a bit chaotic because nothing was clear. We don’t think we’ll continue in this field of games because it’s become like politics—when you’re small, you don’t get attention, and you don’t bother anyone; it’s only when you start growing that you become an enemy because you know too much, and the best thing is to be pushed aside, just like here. We will continue in other businesses we’re already involved in, where we have extensive experience, and with the knowledge we have, we can do many great things. The advice I wanted to give: this group or others that will appear will continue to criticize publishers/games, be careful not to come across someone too big...Such people don’t stop at just a message on the internet...

Might be a good time to mention that Atomic Fabrik is also on the Epic Games Store[store.epicgames.com], so something tells me you'll be alright, Epic Games like to pick up Steam's reject developers, and something tells me you'll still be continuing in game development.

Again, though Cristian, let's be real, me and you are nobodies. You're no big fish and neither am I. We're in our own little internet corner. Let's drop the ego.

And that's not even touching on the disturbing physical violence allusion at the end.

Originally posted by Atomic Fabrik:

Until now, a certain percentage was directed to charity (mostly children with health problems). Perhaps Steam will reconsider this public message, and as we’ve requested, we would like access to games from 2016-2022 to be restored, or at least until 2020, and as we specified in the message to Steam, to have access to keys closed. There wouldn’t be many, as those games have nothing to do with the ones that were banned now, and they are games we worked on, with the revenue from Steam being 100% directed to charity.

The revenue from Steam? What revenue from Steam? Your whole scheme was generated through Jee Two Ayy revenue. Who bought your games on Steam while they were priced at $200? I'm sure in that sense all 0 sales through Steam did go through charity.

Jokes aside, if you did donate money to charity, that's great, I don't want to take that away from you. A piece of advice from myself though since you so kindly offered some to me, if you care about charity so much, and you're looking for a new job, philanthropy may be in your best interest next. In fact, I'd prefer you did philanthropy over helping me identify fake reviews on other games. Or you could do both if you like, help me first and then go on and give out $10,000 to the homeless or something.

----------------------------

And that's the end, I do apologise that was quite a lengthy read, I hope you're still breathing, I hope that you got something, anything from this, and I'll be back next time with hopefully a shorter article.

Special thanks to our Patrons Stefan, Luke & Nin-Nin for their continued support. Be sure to join our Discord to see how you can become a patron today!

Follow me on Twitter[x.com]
Follow Steam Sentinels on Twitter[x.com]
Join our Discord server[discord.gg]
Like our Facebook page[www.facebook.com]
Email me: mellowonline1@gmail.com