搜尋結果

引用自 ShockedHearts：

god yall are genuinely just pessimistic haters. imagine going out of your way to ♥♥♥♥ on every single person who comes in here with any positive posts.

OP I genuinely hope your project is going well. dont let these people get you down. all they want is to prevent people from having fun, and look down on people like ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

best of wishes to your project. make sure to post where we can find it or track it if there is anywhere!

I support knoledge and adapting. I don't support lazyness and making others do all hard work just so others can take free victories.

You are making an art competition for a game that barely works.

Am I the only one that has ALOT of trouble identifying both the "marked bills" and "counterfeit bills"?

I don't know if it's my particular version of colorblindness but trying to pick up the "X" on the bills and the watermarks (and I even bought the giant UV unit).

It's making the game harder to enjoy as more missions require sorting out, or looking for, for these types of bills.

And more importantly, please argue with each other about how these weapons and vehicles are supposed to handle, then post classified documentation to win your arguments.

I am totally not a Chinese spy btw.

引用自 jdolev7：

引用自 Killer7：

Does native support count when they're only adding support for one light gun?

It depends what they mean by it like they have to add raw mouse input for it to work meaning it will make other lightguns work

Ah, I see, I see. I'll wait for the reviews whenever it gets patched, hopefully it'll work for the Sinden, no way I'm dropping $100+ on different lightgun.

引用自 Sethioz：

引用自 Dirc：

Since the update my equipped item no longer pops up at the vending machine, making it a bit tedious to compare. I assume this is unintended.

Also: I am loving this game, these guns feel really awesome :)

works for me, literally played 15 mins ago and comparison worked.

if you're constantly minimizing the game for some reason, then most likely that's your issue. game uses HUD as overlay and by minimizing, it often de-syncs and shows things in wrong place, i had this with item highlights after accidentally minimizing (some other program took focus).

1. always play on fullscreen (not windowed, not borderless, not fullscreen window)
2. DO NOT minimize game while playing,
3. make sure your resolution is set to at least 1920x1080 (things may appear wrong on lower res).

i play in 1440p and everything shows fine, including the comparison. when i hover mouse over an weapon/melee/grenade in fabricator, it pops up the compare for my currently equipped one.

same for items i pickup in rooms, comparison works fine.

Dude, stop sucking up to the game being "perfect". You are annoying in every thread because you have something to say.

It's broken. I play on Fullscreen 1440p, There used to be a comparison screen at the Fabricator when you want to buy a Weapon.

Instead you now have to flick tabs to compare because the screen is missing.

I do believe that change has something to do with recent murrican laws, regarding firearms and their appearance in all sortf of media. That was also the reason why CoD started using fake names like 4 years ago.

Hi
ich habe das Spiel weider neu angefangen und habe auf einmal bei Bewegungen ein Bild Flimmern.

V-Sync hab ich ein und ausgeschaltet hat aber nichts geändert.

I got the game after the MESA update, I thought the 24h map change would shuffle MESA/ALPINES, is this the case and was todays switch just unlucky or are the Alpines gone for good?

引用自 Tonepoet：

引用自 Corvus XIII：

My view that has been expressed before here, is that the USA knew there was going to be conflict in the Middle East. And as reported in article over 15 years ago from memory the FBI knew there was an impending attack and the guy was not taken seriously so he left.

The US did not want Europe building its military for itself defence purposes something those people in your time line wont broadcast much because it does not sound good.

You can do the rest of the research yourself on that matter as it would enable you to form your own opinion on what happened and the US view on what Europe should be doing with its money ie putting it towards NATO so the US can use it and not for European use.
Or your research may tell you differently.

You ever worked with anybody who lost a limb because of a war for another country?
Glad I chose not to sign up to the MOD because of the US 'attitudes' towards its so called allies of recent times.

I vaguely recollect hearing something to those effects, but no, I don't think I will do further research. My opinion is already well enough researched and formed. The U.S.A. is free to change its mind regarding what it wants from its allies, and more importantly its sovereign allies are free to reject the U.S.A's. demands.

Whatever the agreed upon standards were prior to 2002 are all well good and fine, so long as they were met. However, once the alliance does consultation and revises those standards, then those newer standards are the ones that need to be abided from that point onward until they are again revised.

Times change, and we need to adapt to meet the needs of the time, and the 2% guideline is likely what the U.S.A. wanted from its allies in 2002 in preparation for N.A.T.O. to join the middle eastern incursions in 2003.

So the only thing that would change my mind, I think, is if the U.S.A. failed to live up to its Article 3 obligations and the ledger needed to be balanced out for the U.S.A. to play catch-up. However, U.S. military spending has generally been a greater proportion of the G.P.D. than that of its European, allies dating back to at least the 1960s, so that isn't really possible, assuming the money was spent even just halfway effectively.

Also, goodness no. I've only made the acquaintance of one person who lost a limb, but she had it amputated for health reasons. It wasn't lost in combat. I am aware such things happen, although they are rather rare.

Respected by people who appreciate lots of inaccurate words, is all fine when lobbying votes of the ignorant I suppose.

Was it not you who said 'Democratic governments do not need any scrutiny' or words to that effect.
Most interesting outlook.