Resultados da pesquisa

Originalmente postado por Mithy:

Originalmente postado por Sniper_12gage:

For those saying it's a "simple bios flag", that really depends on the rig. Some people have to change their partition type, which is a potentially risky operation. Other bios have it hidden and you need to go through a series of steps to enable it, not all of them obvious. And all of this for an anti-cheat that apparently doesn't work well. It is a valid complaint and likely one the devs didn't consider because they only tested on win 11, which already required secure boot enabled.

I just don't get it though. I have 4 rigs setup in the house with 1 MSI board 2 ROG boards and a Gigabyte board.

None of them require anything other then a flip of the switch.

Millions of people play Valorant & League with needing secure boot on. Almost half a million on steam alone are playing right now and probably millions have played already. So where is the issue? What the couple of idiots who can't figure anything out?

aahh I love how it always ends in name calling, almost had some valid points but ends toxicity. You only see it through your eyes and your experience and if someone doesn't have the same experience as you then they are idiots....the world revolves around only you.
I have one, high end pc on win 11 and its not a flip of the switch. I have not and never will play the games you mentioned...that makes me an idiot? You don't get it though...

Originalmente postado por doofus0510:

Originalmente postado por DivineDarkness{A}:

keep in mind that 0.57% difference is within the top 500 players. So if he was that OP that gap should be much much larger. but its not infact its negligible at best.

he's equal to what is considered one of the strongest anti-tank duelists in the game when it comes to ban rate and wolvie got his increase in ban-rate from the new team-up, bp is just base with zero changes beyond hit detection fixes like he goes from 30% pre-season 3 all the way to almost 50% like idc how you look at it that's a problem no hero should have an over 50% presence when it comes to ban rate and pick rate combined on top of being in the role with the most options when it comes to hero pick

BP is not Anti-Tank. Hes a backliner or diver or whatever you wanna call it. but no way in hell is he anti tank. Also its very clear to me that you dont understand how numbers work. When the top 500 players only squeak out 0.57% more with a smaller pool of games played that should very clearly show you hes not op. Because if he was the top 500 with a smaller pool of games would have a far higher percent.

Ban rates mean nothing. Literally. I can confirm that most of my friend never play against bp. They heard streamer man say its meta to ban him so they ban him. They even go as far as to leave the game if bp is in quick play. If you dont know how easy it is to counter bp then play him for a bit. then play spiderman. If you are trying to tell me that you can kill a support then be on the other side of the map before anything is done. unless the whole team looks at you then its just a skill issue. Spiderman can out play his counters bp cant. Spiderman has auto locking abilities. bp doesnt. Spiderman can anti air easily bp cant.

Mechanically speaking spiderman is far more broken then bp. Can you still counter them yes. one requires the team. the other doesnt.

ok

I agree with every body here !
If devs dont know how to fix cheats in their game without player going to the BIOS, they really have to fire the people in charge of knowing their PC client base !

I ended up having to buy 25 of each bread to progress, though I had around 80 bread according to the counter. It would be nice if the quest kept track of each type in the description.

can we get spamton neo without the cannon?

Originalmente postado por rincewind:

I don't understand why people keep saying that the traders are a forced style. Only with the biome progression in the last update you are forced to visit a trader. And even then is only to get the stupid badge.

And about emcumbrance, some people says that things are dumbed down, others complain that things are not dumbed down enough. Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t.

About performance, the current version works better in my potato, so can't speak for others, but for me it's quite good.

Of course, there are things that I don't like.

Like the lack of sych in the zombies hitting you and the animations. If the zombie don't play the animation, it should not hit you. Or the removal of the temperature system, yes I know that never worked well, hope that they bring it back but working.
The armor system looks good, but I would have liked having the body slot separated into lower and upper slots. If only for the dressing roleplay.

But other things, like wellness or the LBD, good ridance.

Of course it works better, there are only zombie spawns in POI's.

As far as traders, sure you don't HAVE to do quest, but the tutorial in the beginning indicates that is what the developers are designing the game around.

There was a time when you had to make everything, and it was better.

But I guess it really comes down to what type of player you are and what you want the game to be. Believe it or not this game used to actually be scary and no not because I have seen it all a thousand times now. There were real oh crap moments.

AFAICT there are 2 types of players. Immersive survival players and zombie whack-a-mole players.

Removing the ability to complete all new missions on one map is the desire of the scavengers to artificially prolong the gameplay in the game. Personally, I don't see the point or interest in this.

[FR] Analyse du site tfo-helper.fr

Le site tfo-helper.fr est bien fait, un peu comme une encyclopédie collaborative où les joueurs ajoutent leurs infos. Cela peut être très utile, mais la fiabilité dépend des contributeurs.

Côté technique :

Gridinsoft donne un score moyen (55/100) : site probablement sûr, mais prudence si vous donnez des infos perso.

Le domaine est tout récent, créé le 24 février 2025 et expire le 24 février 2026. Il est hébergé en France (Strasbourg).

ScamDoc est plus sévère (score 25 %) car le propriétaire est masqué et le site est tout nouveau. Le HTTPS protège la connexion, mais ça ne garantit pas tout.

En résumé, le site est intéressant, mais évitez de vous inscrire ou de donner des données sensibles tant qu’il n’aura pas fait ses preuves. Vous pouvez l’utiliser pour consulter sans risque.

La prudence, sans paranoïa, reste la meilleure approche.

Bon jeu à tous !
_______________________________________________________
[ENG] Analysis of the site tfo-helper.fr

The site tfo-helper.fr is well-made, like a collaborative encyclopedia where players add their information. It can be very useful, but the reliability depends on the contributors.

Technical aspects:

Gridinsoft gives it an average score (55/100): the site is probably safe, but be cautious when sharing personal information.

The domain is very recent, created on February 24, 2025, and expires on February 24, 2026. It is hosted in France (Strasbourg).

ScamDoc is more critical (score 25%) because the owner is masked and the site is brand new. HTTPS protects the connection, but that doesn’t guarantee everything.

In summary, the site is interesting, but avoid registering or sharing sensitive data until it proves itself. You can safely use it for browsing.

Caution without paranoia is the best approach.

Enjoy the game everyone!