Søkeresultater

Opprinnelig skrevet av FreshRevenge:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Shadow:

Where are the original Bloodline Dev's and how come they aren't saying anything about this game?

The original dev dissolved after the first game release. It wasn't until they were dissolved that the game became a huge hit.

The game became a cult classic. It wasn't a hit when it released.

I remember it was buggy and crashed a lot, but man the game was awesome and fun to play and felt like an actual RPG. I miss Malk, Nosferatu and Gangrel. My favourite mission was the haunted hotel mission with the paranormal and ghost stuff happening there.

I think they should have just remastered that.

I added you. I have a level 82 Mage. Good luck!

Opprinnelig skrevet av ChaffyExpert:

Opprinnelig skrevet av doofus0510:

it isn't a perma ban so it's fine, your still ruining the game for 11 other people because you have ♥♥♥♥♥♥ time management

Then they should develop their game better.

how tho they can't fix the random thing that made you leave in the first place, the sidewalk doesn't walk you to point A to B you walk there on the road when you have your time available to get to your destination and before you walk if your too busy then just don't walk

Opprinnelig skrevet av Roland's 2nd:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Ferrsai:

You're missing the core issue. Bots in Quick Play aren't just about queue times or daily missions—they fundamentally alter the nature of the match. When players are unknowingly placed into bot-heavy games, it creates a false sense of progress and undermines the purpose of the mode.

There’s already a dedicated AI mode for practicing abilities. Quick Play should be a space for real, unscripted interaction between players. Introducing bots into that space—especially without clear disclosure—damages trust and stalls actual skill development.

If anything, new players should be encouraged to beat hard bots consistently before entering QP. That would raise the baseline without compromising match integrity. Padding matches with bots to boost morale or retention metrics might look helpful on paper, but it’s a short-term fix with long-term consequences for the community.

The thing is that the fact that the amount of losses varies, shows that the losses are not the driving factor, the queue times are.
Lose at 4am, good chance your next match is a bot match.
Lose at 3pm on a Saturday and you could easily have 3 more losses before you see a bot match.

Like I'm often playing at 4am (insomnia for the win) so I'm just kinda numb to the bots after a loss or two, and it's always weird when I'm playing on a Saturday and I'm like "alright I guess the next one is a bot match" and it's not, nor the one after that, or the one after that.

I don't necessarily disagree with your points, just people need to understand that it's not exclusively about their feelings and queue times (or region population, if you wanna look at it that way) are the primary factor to whether or not you encounter a bot match.

Opprinnelig skrevet av EmperorVolo:

Apparently it stops at level 30-40 somewhere around there.

Idk where you heard that, I'm level 96 and nothing has changed.

Roland, you raise a fair point about queue times and regional population. But I think part of the frustration stems from how far we've drifted from older systems that handled this differently—more transparently, and arguably more respectfully.

I'm not sure about your background or age, but maybe for the younger players: back in the days of Unreal Tournament, Quake 3, and early Counter-Strike, Quick Play didn’t exist in the modern sense. You didn’t hit a button and get fed into a match by an invisible hand. You joined a lobby—a real one. With a server name, a player list, a ping column, and sometimes even pre-match chat. You saw who was in the game, what map was running, and chose whether to join. If the server was half-full, you knew it. If it was full of bots, it said so. No illusions. No padding. Just clarity.

There was friction, yes—but it was honest friction. You weren’t being smoothed into a dopamine loop. You were choosing your battles. And because of that, the matches had texture. You remembered players. Rivalries formed. Skill was visible, not abstracted behind hidden MMR curves and engagement metrics.

If bots are necessary, fine. But let players see the composition. Let them opt in. Don’t wrap it in a veil of matchmaking convenience and call it a feature.

That would be quite a departure and an overhaul, but there's something in there that's key. Bots shouldn’t be used to fill matches, only to patch them. A reasonable limit would be no more than two bots per team, and never more than one extra bot on either side. That way, you preserve the core player-versus-player dynamic and avoid matches that feel entirely synthetic. That could serve as a solid baseline, with room to extend to three per side during extreme off-hours.

This kind of constraint would give us some of the advantages of the lobby-style system for Quick Play, where matches are built around real players first, and bots are only used to stabilize odd numbered matches or the queue being short on players. It’s not about eliminating bots entirely—it’s about making sure they don’t become the default solution to population gaps.

If the regional queue is truly that sparse, the game could just show how many players are online and available. Let us see the numbers. Then we could choose: queue anyway, opt into bot matches directly, or spend our time elsewhere.

I'm not asking for nostalgia—I'm asking for agency. Or at the very least, the information needed to make a real choice.

Bethesda never puts anything away when they are done.
- The guard at Akila that stops you for the bank robbery dialogue
- The Neon security in Lagrange's shop
- Drexler in the warehouse at the end of the Ebbstriker quests.

Fallout 4 had the same issues:
- Dr Sun disappearing to his home and never going back to shop after investigating the other doctor.
- Riley disappears at the end of the Cannery quest, even if you had her join the settlement.

If you think story lines are supposed to make sense then ask yourself this.
- The winning ending for the Railroad in Fallout 4 means they make themselves extinct.

So if they cannot even be bothered to put NPCs back where they got them then what makes you think they would ever tie up loose ends in a story?

Lets face reality, nobody buys Bethesda games for the story and quests, they buy them because they are a moddable open world shooters and looters. If you end up getting some Bethesda made story line in the game that are worth playing then that is a bonus.

What that old phrase? Put enough monkeys on typewriters eventually one of them writes War and Peace?

Opprinnelig skrevet av Rain :):

Opprinnelig skrevet av $2 Hero:

The point backs up the video. 1 million men infected with covid puke into petri dish and you cannot see virus even with electron microscope. Man in video, which you probably didn't watch but used AI and Snopes to disprove lol clearly states as much. This why virus do not exist, which the mans entire point was. Which you missed because you didn't even watch said video. I feel like I've been over this but you seem to need multiple going overs. Be well.

Clearly it's me who doesn't understand. You should share your findings publicly; I'm sure there's a Nobel prize waiting for you

Doesn't matter because TV is God remember?

having the leak also. Moving stuff from stash. Sent report. FYI it also seems the dev team favors using reddit - and discord - for communication. (Jumping through social media hoops when steam is the actual store is a discussion needs to be have someday)

Your both going to laugh i checked here, about an hour ago, saw no anwser then went in and moved around a bunch and solved both of them. I guess i ended up pulling what programers call "talking to the yellow duck"?

But thank you for the help

With 1. i was convinced i had to stand on the destroyed monster spawner and redirect the beam, i thought the pointer itself was solid, DOH.

4. I lucked out i was checking for coins and stumbled into the when i got above the door. I've now saved the princess and reached the end of the Early Access, though i still need to work on a few things i didn't find the first time.

P.S that king is very suspicious.

Can you make a really rare chance that the tropics are replaced with Anor Londo?