검색 결과

294,709,939개 중 1~10개 표시 중
2
魅魔在哪
포럼내 "Off Topic"
7
would u date a celibate male?
방금
Nülliflower
153
14
Word from the Devs: Ready For A Fight!
방금
Kain Mercer
18
1
slow and boring
방금
donut32
14
[Patch Notes] August 8th
방금
2197943063
19
Landfall has GOT TO GO
방금
Doctor Zalgo
14
Should Reloading Block Running
방금
Invader Zim
Bif 님이 먼저 게시:
Invader Zim 님이 먼저 게시:
Foolishness should not be rewarded, in any game where one has to reload a weapon be it a bow or pistol etc. it's always best to retreat to a safe place where one has cover. If you reload with zombies running at you then you should have to cope with the result. Anyone with forethought should be able to split skill points into what ever their main tree is and enough points into Agility to facilitate said main tree. I started a fresh game for this experimental and am in Intel and Agility on day 3 with Parkour 1 Agility 5 and Intel 5, I plan to unlock intel mastery for the tier 2 and 3 book perks and from there get into higher Parkour.
Short term planning for the Long term goal. :munchies:
My dear Zim, guns reload automatically. It was not foolishness, but incorrect coding, that caused me to stop running. Correct coding would have been to stop reloading. That's the point.
My dear Bif, Um, no they don't. If they did then why does Glock9 always have empty guns. Having just scoured the game settings menu's looking for an auto-reload toggle that is new, checking my own game's for the evidence of automatic reloading in any way, I can say with 100% confidence that you don't understand what happens when you reload in this game. It's not bad coding because it's working as intended, in other words, that is your opinion. Your opinion does not change the fact that Run and Gun is a perk in this game, one that you think should just be given to you because you think so. Train Run and Gun. I will now enjoy my forum ban for daring to have this conversation. :munchies:
34
1
BE honest BF6 or BO7 ?
방금
MYKORL
포럼내 "Deutsches Forum"
859
17
Nur nicht blau
8
I miss the nice engineer lady on my super destroyer
Unique_Username_Here 님이 먼저 게시:

Why exactly are you talking about unions like they're some kind of shady cabal that controls the world's corporations? Oh, the horror of letting the people that are actually doing the work have some power instead of the people that tell them what to do making up all the rules.
You either have not understood the reason behind this being a shadier business practice or are unwilling to understand it.

Regardless the reason this is much shadier than seen in standard practices is because this is an attempt at gaining a monopoly over who can and cannot be allowed to sign on with the studios that have agreed to this specific union since one among their demands is literally that studios and companies that sign on with voice actors who are members of this union are disallowed from signing on with other voice actors who are not associated with this very same union at all.

This means quite literally in practice that once they have a voice actor coming from this one union, they are disallowed from hiring any other voice actors that aren't a member of their union and cannot go with people that have been referred by others in the studio or have been sending in auditions from agencies that don't have an association with them.

You mentioned sarcastically that it must be a horror for people that are working to have some power in their field instead of the corporations that usually are the ones lording over them.

But what you fail to understand is this union with these demands are effectively blacklisting countless other voice actors from working with studios who have already been contracted by the union and barring them from getting work and forcing them to either become a member or continue on getting barred entry into their own field of work by attempting to remain independent or associated with an agency.

That literally takes away even more power from the people inside the voice industry and from the corporations both and puts it into the hands of this specific union that wants to have a complete monopoly over contracts and puts things in a state even worse than before.

There is also the fact that being associated with this union should the strike end with their demands being met will result in their voice actors having their credit stripped from them during the production of any given media item they're involved with.

So instead of it being written down as "Character X - Actor Y" it would be written as "Character X - Union Y."

This effectively wipes away the potential mark and career history they could easily make for themselves due to their credit being stripped away and replaced with the name of this specific union.

Setting that aside did you not even read the part in which the voice actors who are involved with this movement and have been giving out these demands are responsible for engaging in mass harassment against independent voice actors who have been offering themselves for roles these striking actors have leaving unfilled?

I don't see what moral standing they have over others and how they have convinced you they are at all an acceptable group in the face of these practices.

Unless I'm misremembering, I think the union is SAGAFTRA or something similar to that.
294,709,939개 중 1~10개 표시 중