Résultats de la recherche

Takari a écrit :

Need fix When changing screen or sound card

what happens when you change your screen or sound card?

Finni_112 a écrit :

TheRebelGreaser a écrit :

They changed the product that was originally presented people are upset because of that and rightfully so the censorship is not okay and on a side note for being a realistic depiction of the SWAT pretty unrealistic to make those changes at the end of the day as well.

Its okay for people to be mad but the Gameplay didnt even change yes they decreased the Graphics a bit which i didnt notice i do not see an problem with a little bit of censoring. They couldve not negotiated and everything would be censored, the Console Version is actually more censored a bit. Yes they couldve not censored the PC Version at all or make a button, but i dont think you know how much work it takes to make a game. Its the same thing with the people being angry that the Graphics in GTA 6 werent even that good in the leak and thats because games need time to develop. This whole ragebait-♥♥♥♥ is just not needed.

But it's not about the gameplay what it is about is we should have never been forced into this update at all because the entire problem is that they censored the PC version but no one on steam has ever asked for as far as I am aware, but yes they could make a toggle but they don't want to because they wouldn't make two different versions of the game as they would say even though all it is is the asset change and doesn't affect anything else outside of that.

But they don't understand that but they didn't decrease the graphics a bit they butchered it I looked at a comparison the other day probably a week ago there is a glaring difference big Ephesus on glaring supposedly it's a bug really I've never seen a game bug out that bad and my decade of gaming I can't give exact number I don't remember beside the point.


I don't see how they can say this is a realistic depiction of the SWAT when what criminal is going to go through all the trouble of what these changes did really think of that.

Moreover with the women in the container.

What do you mean rage baiting I don't see anyone doing so at least not many people that are trying to be serious.

FishSandwich a écrit :

no a écrit :

>So let me get this straight: you’re mad that a Windows-based game doesn’t fully support your penguin-powered OS
I'm not mad, just sad that I won't get to keep enjoying a franchise that I love.

>and now you're lobbying for servers with no meaningful anti-cheat...
I totally understand the concerns with cheaters and am fully supportive of there being official servers that require Secure Boot + KAC. Cheaters ruin the fun for everyone and that's a reasonable strategy to address them. There can be meaningful anti-cheat on the community-run servers (that EA wouldn't even need to host, wouldn't need to spend any effort to maintain - just a second copy of build scripts for regular servers with the old Punkbuster system instead of the new Javelin system).

>Bro, this is like showing up to a Mario Kart tournament with a Dreamcast and demanding compatibility in the name of fairness.
I am not making any demands. I am just asking whether my idea is unreasonable, I don't think it is.

>you're asking for cheat-friendly daycare mode because your OS-of-principle doesn’t play nice with basic security
I am not asking for cheat-friendly daycare mode, just Linux compatibility. I totally understand that not everyone wants to use Linux, and I totally understand that most people just want servers with the newest and best anti-cheat available. I agree with that and support that!

>‘Just make two server types!’ you say, like it’s that easy.
It is. Javelin doesn't need to tightly interweaved with the core game and server code and full of dependencies that the game needs to run, it's a layer that runs on top of the game server itself, that can be optionally removed if EA wanted to offer us that, with no ongoing effort to maintain that.

>one for people who want to actually play the game
I just want to play the game, and I don't care about ranked servers or having an "official" account that is allowed to play in all lobbies, I just would like the ability to host my own server at my own expense to play the first good-looking battlefield game in a long time. BF1, BF5, and BF2042 were all big disappointments to a lot of people, including me.

>bring your own .dll.
These are dynamic libraries that can be unforgeably cryptographically signed and the game can refuse to start with modified ones. Developers have had the capability to do this with anti-cheat long before KAC.

>But don’t act like locking out kernel-level anti-cheat is some noble stand for freedom
Again, I don't want to get rid of KAC. I think 99% of players would only want to play on official servers that require the full Javelin KAC + secure boot configuration, and that's fine, I don't want to play on those servers, and I don't want to force anyone to play on my own self-hosted server, I just want to be able to play the game at all on Linux.

>You chose to play on Hard Mode: Life Edition. Don’t complain that not every dev wants to code a separate universe so you can pretend BF6 is open-source.
I am not complaining, just asking a question about how unreasonable it is to have a second build script with one line changed, add one new field for the server listing code, one new UI element in the server browser (official / ranked / KAC vs community / unranked / old Punkbuster AC or similar that works with Linux + Proton).

At the end of the day, I fully recognize that my wants are not reflective of 99% of the battlefield community, and that EA is under no obligation to put in even 1 extra second of work to support even basic Linux compatibility. Sorry if my request has angered or offended you, that was not my intention, I just wanted to start a civil dialogue about whether or not this was an unrealistic request (not a demand, not an expectation, just a small hope that I might keep being able to play battlefield into the future)

Look, I get that you’re frustrated about not being able to play on Linux, but let’s be real here—pushing for servers without proper anti-cheat protection introduces huge security risks. Allowing a system where cheaters can bypass protections opens the door for hacks to flood official servers, which ruins the experience for everyone.

You say you love the game, but it’s not a “game over” situation for you. BF6 will be available on launch for all major platforms, including Xbox Series X, PS5, and Windows PC. Nobody’s stopping you from playing the game. You just can’t play it on your penguin-powered OS, and that's the reality of it.

Trying to force the devs to support Linux in a way that compromises security for a minority of players doesn’t make sense. Let’s not act like security flaws are just some minor inconvenience. The moment cheaters start exploiting these gaps, everyone suffers, and that’s something the community can’t afford.

So, while I understand the disappointment, asking for Linux support in a way that bypasses anti-cheat protections isn't the solution. The real issue here is making sure the game stays fair and secure for all players, and introducing risky, half-baked workarounds isn't the way to go.

they could port their anticheat to linux, they just don't want to, they have the money they have the time.

That aside ,I am actually really annoyed that both microsoft and these game publishers are literally misinforming people about these security features, both secureboot and tpm were never intended to be used this way, and they have serious flaws, which will be used to circumvent them in the context of anticheat, trusting something that cannot be trusted, is worse than assuming it is not trustworthy and building your stuff with that in mind.

how are they flawed you might ask?, in the context of secureboot, many platform keys are compromised, meaning anybody can use them,these are used for signing firmware and are used for verification, secondly secureboot allows the user to install their own keys and certs, not just microsoft's.
TPM operates over an unencrypted bus, which can be accessed with a $10 tool, and leak all keys , commands ect, and many hardware tpm modules are exploitable without the need for a tool, None of the afflicted modules are blacklisted, none of the keys are black listed, there is no way to revoke them because it would mean millions of pcs would no longer boot.


I would much rather them heavily obfuscate their stuff like denuvo and suffer a 50% performance hit, than trust TPM and secureboot to take care of it. its frankly ridiculous that anybody buys EA etcs explanation. They are exploiting the ignorance and trust of their customers to feign the appearance of competence. makes their customers happy, but doesn't actually fix the core problem, which is that x86 hardware cannot be trusted period.

Soulinor a écrit :

So, you used a guide, knowing exactly what to do. Well, congrats, that is the same as cheating.

Me when I'm publicly desperate for Steam Points

More info in can run it in desktop mode but not in game mode.... It's on Steam Deck btw...

Seamus a écrit :

Septimus-Prime a écrit :

Dude... you lost me... What does Trump have to do with what we are talking about? Btw, look at my last post before you just posted I edited the one before this one, take a good look, will you?

Trump is a word. You really need to work on your vocabulary.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trump

Maybe you're right, but as Robocop once said in this game "No One Is Infallible" Btw, look a the link I provided earlier, go to Notes & Trivia and read the words to me, that's Wikipedia I provided.

This was quite an old post before the most recent comments so I have locked it to prevent confusion.

Panic a écrit :

I hope Fumcom see this, departing something you like is painful, but the way they have layered it, ,, it's brutal. Farewell, enjoy your travels

i mean is it really funcoms fault this guy played 60 hours a week? lol. Most games aren't built around someone playing it as a full-time job. Some are like LoL or WoW

bandalsquit a écrit :

These past 2 evenings have been absolutely destroyed by who ever is on the game through out the free month. I have been singing the praises of this sim to anyone and everyone. This past 2 days has been screaming at the screen, and I never do that.

Is the re even a system to report deliberate wreckers? I haven't seen it. But there needs to be an active person/mod who can and does keep a close eye of these things. its at the point where I have just given up playing. Maybe I'll come back on the 19th August and try again with the regular paying crowd. atleast I know they are here to drive, not act like a ♥♥♥♥.

Come on Developers. There is no point creating all this new content if we cant enjoy it.

Ofcourse you can report them and eventually get them banned.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd-L9LMaUJMa85mLgFwCLbjWKIzABNeXin04hEPlXp6KQHg4A/viewform?pli=1

Second Planet, Coffee Machine cannot be moved in custom Kitchen