Søgeresultater

1:1 Same set trades for free because I understand the frustrations of trying to complete a set. Duplicates and 15 day trade holds are welcomed. Hope you find what you need.

https://steamcommunity.com/tradeoffer/new/?partner=241687753&token=PwnASBBn

yes, lot of small freeze ( seconds),
maybe every time something (magnet) explose ? not sure, but it always happen when the run start to "go well"

but dodging projectiles and collisions is almost impossible when it happen^^"

Also put this a while ago in the Wildgate official Discord:

Wildgate launched at a similar price to games like PULSAR Lost Colony, Sea of Thieves, and Guns of Icarus, but its competitive nature and steep learning curve make that upfront cost harder to justify for new players. It takes time to get the hang of your role, manage tasks, and learn how to fight both with the ship and in first-person. That kind of learning curve usually stretches beyond the typical refund window, which can turn people away before they really understand what the game has to offer.

A trial version with access to something like Team Deathmatch and a proper tutorial could help ease people into the game (even a trial period weekend once in a while). It would give them a chance to explore the mechanics without needing to commit right away, which feels especially important for a title that's still finding its audience.

Comparing Wildgate to large free-to-play games with massive launch content and advanced monetization systems doesn't really fit. A more relevant example is PUBG. It started small and gained traction through word of mouth and support from content creators rather than polish or heavy monetization.

Even with its early popularity, PUBG's PC version struggled for years. It had performance issues, slow updates, and was eventually overshadowed by the mobile version, which offered more frequent content, better cosmetics, and real progression. The PC version later went free-to-play in an effort to bring players back, but by then, much of its momentum had been lost. Only after years of steady updates and listening to community feedback did it begin to recover its place in the genre.

Good games don't happen overnight. They grow through feedback, community support, and consistent updates. Wildgate has a solid foundation, but to really thrive, it needs time, communication, and ways to help new players stick around long enough to see what makes it special.

Add me - t4m3r

Sure i will major ToM.

Well both are different apples.

Starfield while trying to present something innovative is strongly rooted in the classic Bethesda mechanics - straight from 2006 (i know you love it Rebecca) .
But not bad at all , for me it is good game with awesome audio and video, plus nice universe.
Surely i wanted more from Bethesda and i belive they will deliver more in a sequel or dlcs.
Why im still here , playing again - well it is just the same itch i still playing Skyrim SE with mods and Fallout 4 plus lots of classic titles. It has no sense for ordinary gamer who moves as soon as finish the game. I like to go back to the roleplaying games, and Beth titles are perfect for that due to modding potential.

Cyberpunk for me is beautiful, chaotic painting with mix of various mechanics, and good wriritng. I like it , despite it is more action oriented rpg , sometimes like shooter but still it has good story and good questing system. But for me it is just a game for one max, two playthroughs which is not bad.
Im eagerly waiting for the sequel as it will have much better UE5 engine, similar i waiting for Witcher 4.

Which game i like more - for me its hard to decide i like them for different reasons. Each of them is worth of playing time and return. Maybe i like Starfield little more becouse it has better mods and modding potential thus longer life.

BUt both are very good roleplaying games.

After installing the mod, the Publisher tab appears completely blank and the game isn't being published.

Check the official discord group. theres a sub channel there where ppl share crowns.

Oprindeligt skrevet af BigWezz:

Oprindeligt skrevet af blastingweevil:

must be a Krafton fan boy.. to push back a game that was "Ready for early access" like the subnauticas before so they did not have to pay out the 250 million time bonus then fire the 3 main people from original team After promising not to change anything smacks of greed krafton will not get a penny from me EVER...

Well it was ready according to those three devs.

And apparently, most of that bonus money was going to be paid to them too, not the rest of tge team who were directly creating the game.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Hiro:

Oprindeligt skrevet af blastingweevil:

must be a Krafton fan boy..

What gave you this idea?
Seems another "do you like apples? then you must hate oranges." argument...

Oprindeligt skrevet af blastingweevil:

to push back a game that was "Ready for early access"

We will have to define "ready" here.

Oprindeligt skrevet af blastingweevil:

3 main people from original team

Same people that made Below Zero, and we all know the direction that game took.
I don't wan't a Below Zero 2...

Oprindeligt skrevet af BigWezz:

Well it was ready according to those three devs.

And apparently, most of that bonus money was going to be paid to them too, not the rest of tge team who were directly creating the game.

^ This!

except there were no source or track record of the executives doing shady ♥♥♥♥ like not paying their dev team. They stated they did want to pay their devs. Currently there is no proof of either side for that matter. Whereas krafton has a huge bad track record of spewing out garbage early access games and monetizing them. Oh and the replacement executive is the co directer of dead space 3 that says enough about kraftons thought process. Subnautica 2 is as of now most likely gonna be another early access scam.

I haven't played Muscovy in a long while, but I never had to spend a ton of dip in peace deals, and you'll fix your money issues sooner than your manpower ones, so deving more mil than dip early on is a good idea. I never take an admin idea first unless I can do a lot of vassal feeding, so I'm with you there, but I never take a mil idea first so that I can stay ahead of time on tech. I wouldn't completely delete the starting cavalry, keep 2 for flanking smaller-than-combat-width armies to more quickly win battles and save on manpower over time, and then 4 when you start inheriting them from vassals.