Всички дискусии > Steam форум

Резултати от търсенето

Сортиране по:

Резултати за „办理假威斯康星州<网址:ｂｚｗ９８５.ｃｏｍ>盘锦办理托科阿福尔斯学院毕业证-表演学院文凭毕业证怎么仿制[办证网:ｂｚｗ９８５.ｃｏｍ]办理新罕布什尔大学学历认证TQ“

< 1 2 3 ... 29,455,076 >

Показване на 1 — 10 от 294,550,752 постъпления

Във форум „DRAGON BALL FighterZ Общи дискусии“

MAINTENANCE?!?!?!?!?

Току-що

Krimson King

AHHH ITS HAPPENING, EVERYONE STAY CALM!

Във форум „Marvel Rivals Общи дискусии“

138

FIX THE MATCHMAKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Току-що

Roland's 2nd

Първоначално публикувано от bradams:
Първоначално публикувано от Roland's 2nd:
JFC I literally quoted the ai.
That is Google ai I quoted!

Some of us are smart enough to use the "Dive Deeper" button

And no, it is not used colloquially. (and given you lied about it being used for the last 8 years, why should anyone believe you?)

You have absolutely no room to talk about proof when you still haven't proven your outrageous claims over 24 hours later.

You said EOMM is "definitely in QP" so right there is 4000 QP matches, prove it.

Did you even read the second paragraph of the thing you posted as proof of how I'm wrong and that nobody uses it as a substitute term for a matchmaking system prioritizing engagement? Ill post it for you:

-The publication and its findings became more widely disseminated and discussed on gaming forums in subsequent years, particularly around 2020.
Public awareness and discussion of the EOMM concept on gaming forums largely blossomed from players referencing the paper's findings at a later date, and connecting them to their in-game experiences, particularly around game launches or matchmaking updates.-

What do you think "Discussion of the EOMM concept" means? Keyword: Concept. Because according to you, there is no concept. According to you, EOMM has only ever been discussed as 1 thing: EA's patent. According to you, nobody has EVER loosely referred to EOMM as a system of matchmaking prioritizing engagement. So why would the search you did to prove me wrong, suggest that EOMM was discussed as a "concept", when you yourself say nobody has ever thought of EOMM as a concept before? EOMM is just the patent, right? Not a concept? Engagement based matchmaking is the concept. EOMM is just the patent, right? Then why is google saying EOMM is the concept?

How were players connecting the EOMM patent to their in-game experiences if, as you say, EOMM is just the patent? Were people relating their losses to what its like to be words in a patent? It doesn't make any sense, unless of course, you admit that when people talk about EOMM, most of the time, they are using the term EOMM interchangeably with similar systems to what existed in that patent, and not the patent itself, as you like to pretend you think they are doing.

Yea, I assumed people were calling all engagement based matchmakers EOMM's immediately after learning it exists, but I guess it took a few years. If the victory of my misspeak on when they started doing so means that much to you, you can have it. It doesn't change the point I was making at all, which is that for years players have been referring to all engagement based matchmakers as "EOMM". It doesn't change the fact that even your own google search shows that people have been using the term EOMM to refer to the concept of a matchmaker that prioritizes engagement over fairness for 5 years now, and that your argument that nobody ever has before is extremely disingenuous.