Resultados da busca

Escrito originalmente por Some Kinda Kobold:

People in these forums are entitled af.

understatement

If you try before time is fully up it retstarts the timer. Dont touch it.

i ended up sleeping before lunch most of the time. did i miss something? what did you do?

Escrito originalmente por Sandman2021:

Escrito originalmente por eclipsov:

АХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХАХА

Лучше обойтись без подобных насмешек, ибо другой стороной это может счесться как не загорать в голос ну провокация. По этому было бы более разумным решением проигнорировать сие высказывание.

Я понимаю, конечно, но когда такое вижу, ну трудно же не угорать в голосину

1st 2. I'm a tank.

No, because from the outset he states that he worked at Advent.
He gives the impression of being a ‘real’ and ‘good’ scientist who discovered that his work was being misused to harm the community.
On the other hand, we learn some questionable things about Dr Vahlen's future.

gather around folks, it's story time (TLDR: scroll down to the h1):

even in BF2 I had plenty matches in which players did lutanic activities. almost as braindead as you see it in CoD or BF nowadays.

however BF2 indeed managed to regulate the amount of stupidity by limiting gameplay features, e.g.:
- no autoheal for anything – only medics were able to revive and heal, which forced any player to proceed with caution, to eventually fallback and change positions while always having an eye on the medic. vehicles needed to be repaired by engineers or supply drops.

- players were only able to spawn at the SL – which forced the SL to always evaluate the current situation, especially beyond the frontlines.

- strict classes including a very limited variety of weapons to choose from

- no infinite stamina for infantry

[...]

these core elements made any idiot realize very quickly that it is very hard to proceed without support.

this sensitive "net of dependencies" eroded over the last 15–20 years. imho mostly caused by the publishers dragging their studios to build in features which increased the players' "time-to-live". I've read gaming articles back then which suggested that having a greater "time-to-live" would increase the chance that (casual) players may eventually use any ingame or signature feature which was designed to differentiate from other shooters. Publishers have noticed that many players weren't able to progress to a certain point which enables them to use those features because dedicated pro players blocked or made it very hard for them to progress. So, they made it easier to compete with pros (autoheal, respawn at any squad member, mix class features like C4 etc. with any weapon) – again, this happened gradually over the course of many years.

Back then it made sense: less complex → increased time-to-live → more chances to use those exclusive features → increasing probability to make the player enjoy his match → better reviews, feedback → increase in sellings.

BUT, this shifted the expectations of the customers, leading to games with features and ingame mechanics we have today... basically it has been normalized to have "easy" shooters mixed with tiny bits of teamplay combined with some sort of ADHD jumping gameplay to make flanking those pros easier and faster.

for me it comes down to this question: Was it the greed of the publishers which led us to these washed-down standards or did the pro players dominate the public servers too often, making it nearly impossible for casuals to get any joy or progress?

So...,
is Squad the successor of BF2?
15 years ago I switched to PR to have any real challenge; dominating public servers made no fun anymore. I quickly realized that PR was nothing like BF2.
And so I think... no, bf2 was a fun online shooter...

... in which you DIDN'T need 15–20 min. (in RAAS) prep-time to get all players into gunfights.

... in which you could join a public server, turn on music and start playing as you wished.

... in which you haven't been bound to the needs of the squad. You picked any class and had fun.

Having quick enjoyable fights was the main aspect. PR and squad are the complete opposite. But yes, squad has core elements which remind of bf2 , but bf2 and its definition of teamplay and mechanics in shooters has unfortunately died 15–20 years ago and is uncompareable to anything we have nowadays.

Maybe From haker

Escrito originalmente por L:

Escrito originalmente por GqM:

Have you inserted the calendar into the slot on the statue? Just walk near the slot, hit W and S until you are standing in the right spot and hit SPACE.

I want to ask you a question, If not use statue, the only way is debark to Bay of Peril and fight all the way to Tayasal, if use this way, then unique officers will follow player to come in to Tayasal? If not ,only Charles himself alone?Just curious.

If you start from the Bay of Peril (only way to obtain the crazy amount of treasures from Tayasal), Charles will enter Tayasal alone. The fight isn't that difficult since you can just run around the arena, dodging shots from the 2nd & 3rd wave of Itza warriors.

think u have some software that is banned by the game. Look for a list n see if u have them installed. might be in the FAQ or something.

If anyone want`s to host the siege, I`m free for a while.