Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
For example:
http://i.imgur.com/h7b4ddu.png
http://steamcommunity.com/id/EmoRin/
Again, I feel it is unfair to expel the "schemers". This was designed as a meta game. Steam's users are all gamers. They easily got carried away in the heat of the moment. There never was malicious intent on their part, nor did they "hack" anything. It was a real simple exploit.
It is dishonest, yes. But I believe a good many of us would have done the same given the circumstances.
I hope Steam reverses all transactions for those "schemers" since the Auction, but to ban them for life is immensely unfair.
And THEN Valve ended up giving the same hat anyway to those who cheated back in the day. Not to the new games who came after that event and have been playing the game fair and square without cheats, no. They decided to specifically reward those who had previously cheated and didn't get the hat back in the day.
So THAT pretty much tells you how much Valve DOESN'T punish cheaters.