Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
My general rule is to spend no more then $20 on a game. If it is one with a history of a lot of DLC, I will wait until all the DLC is released and in a single package and under $20.
Rare is the game that I am willing to pay more for. Even then, unless I can get the base game + season pass for the same price as the base game released for, I will still hold off.
But il say that around 99/98% of my library is sales and bundles
Otherwise I'll wait for a sale.
If it's tripple-A, I'll always wait for a sale regardless.
I searching in the internet if i can get it cheaper but normaly i pay every price, if i see fun in one Game.
(This applies to games I want, of course -- games I don't want are basically worth nothing to me and I might take them if they're a freebie. Maybe.)
When I'm tight on money I'm less willing to buy games so I wait for bigger discounts.
Additionally, now that I have a pretty substantial collection of games, the fact that I haven't played the games I have yet is actually causing me to wait for bigger discounts. There's diminishing marginal value for every new game I acquire, on par.
On the other hand, I've occasionally been more generous for some games I really like, and I'm also aware that these rock-bottom prices I typically pay tend to not do much for the dev -- and it's a bit unfair for devs whose work I actually like, so maybe I should pay more.
So maybe I should instead be more selective -- be more willing to give money to things, but also buy fewer games.
So now there's a bit of a staring contest: who's going to blink first?
^
Paying full price just so you can play a game sooner doesn't make sense imo.
A game will be just as enjoyable next year as it is today. Might even be more enjoyable even with patches, balance changes, and bugfixes occuring.
In fact, given the backlog of games that I bought because I actually wanted to play them some day, but some day hasn't arrived yet, I can even ignore bread-and-butter "good" sales, and only go with "excellent" sales.
As far as I'm concerned, there's just no point in paying a full price today, and then have it sit in my library for a few years before I actually play it. If it happens at all.
Yes I can wait 2 years to get a $60 game for $5, Actually I am not waiting at all.., I am always playing good games all the time, but 2 years previous to me.