Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Incredibly few people took Steam Spy's data with the requisite helping of salt, so mostly it was just a source of gamers making rubbish assumptions about developers, pointless sales-figure cockfighting, and the occasional ridiculous blog post.
More privacy should always be the default setting (edit: well, okay, let me rather say that this is a general tendency, not an absolute rule. But Valve's choice here seems good.)
The game details setting should default to the same as the profile privacy setting, as people with private profiles usually want private stats and people with public profiles usually want public stats. This best captures the users' wishes, saves Steam related websites and tools, and still allows anyone to change to a different setting if they prefer.
What Steam has to win by harming tracking sites like SteamDB and SteamSpy?
I know right? Why is it that by default, I can't enter someone's house until they allow me in? I should be able to enter anyone's house until they specifically tell me not to.
@ The news itself, invisible mode will be greatly welcome.
But if we're operating on the idea that most people have (or had, rather) the privacy setting they want, and that most of those public profile users actively want their information shared, then surely, we only got to that state by users making their profiles that way, consciously, without a notification (because there has never been one). So if we got to the "mostly everyone has it set up the way they want" state before, there's no reason we won't get to that point again. If it really is true that all these people actively want their game lists public, then they'll make them public, and tracking sites can go back to using them.
The way I see it, the only reason to object on these grounds is if you actually suspect that a significant chunk of the people who left their profiles public didn't do so out of a conscious choice, but rather they'd just left it on the default because they hadn't really thought about it. And that's not consent, it's not "wanting the information shared".
Where's the user feedback that "caused" this update? I can't find it anywhere
Besides you could already make your profile private so I see little value of this. Unless Valve specifically wants to kill 3rd party tracking sites.