ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
Well. There's quiet a few games from the "old days" that i simply won't buy
because they're not updated to suit todays monitors.
I've even refunded a few games because they were unplayable on a high res screen.
No updates does no equate to abandoned either.
Still. There are constantly tons of posts on forums of older games requesting
updates to suit todays resolutions before they buy the games, or no deal.
For me it's very simply. If you have a product that you don't care about anymore,
have by definition, abandoned it.
I know it's not that simple. But that IS the very definition of abandoning .
Imo a developer that doesn't attend to or produces any form of updates to a game
or developes a game of the IP in 5 years, should have to re-apply for the licence to
said IP while at the same time giving other companies the opportunity to make
a claim for said IP to make something constructive or even update older software.
Having a bloodsucking leech like <insert optional publisher> owning several IP's for xx amount of years without actually having to do ANYTHING constructive, or even canceling whole games based on popular IP's like Star Wars.. that will in the end ruin the gaming industry.
imo..
If you are into modding games, or tinkering with files, abandonware is a pretty hobby.
x2
I could definitely see something like that applied to 'abandonware' as well. But if it will change anything remains to be seen. Most well known games from the 80's / 90's are still under active ownership.
No, it is not.
That is called completing production of the game. They sill own the IP and it is still under copyright.
Doesn't matter what people think or how they feel about it. Unless the game's developer/publisher and/or IP holder agree to make it free, no one else can touch it with out legal consequences.
The developer/publisher and/or IP holder can still use the IP and do what they want with the game.
While the game's don't run at today resolutions, that doesn't mean they can't be played on todays monitors. I have the Ultima Collection from GOG.com and it runs just fine. I even have some old games from 5 1/4in floppies that I copied over and those games still run too, even on current monitors.
People wanting it to support 4k or such, out of the box, doesn't mean abandoned.
That does apply to PC games as well, AND under copyright law. Such a situation would be legal.
Unfortunately it may be far longer then 30 or 50 years.
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/getting-creative-with-video-games-69693/
to the point where i couldn't see what i was doing, and the UI overall was terrible.
I also bought a tried playing Darkstone and it was a horrible experience on a
high reso screen.
Most of the older games in general better in terms of gameplay and run,
but they're simply not compatible with todays screens.
Having to pay for a game that doesn't work on today monitors is just wrong.