do you think humans would be able to survive a nuclear war and a nuclear winter?

[fnv]

[Hobbit XIII]

Opprinnelig skrevet av vkobe:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Hobbit XIII:

right and did you read my answer shortly after ?

they restrict it, because they fear about radiation, than the bomber is not able to escape the blast, than the blast going to break glass in important cities in russia like Murmansk

reason is the design is supposed to use uranium 238 shell, but they prefer to replace with lead, because uranium 238 go fission+thermonulear explosion=a good radiation fallout

but tsar bomba didnt have enough nuclear fusion fuel to go above 100 megaton

Without being rude, stop talking to me!
I already said the reference of it moving the Earth has been retracted probably some time ago. by looks of it.

I am now looking up about Ceasar Romero to do with another thread.

[sfnhltb]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Kat:

do you think humans would be able to survive a nuclear war and a nuclear winter?

Yes to the nuclear war, plenty of places wouldn't be targeted even in the worst case scenarios. And nuclear winter is long since debunked (since the early 1990s at the latest).

[ZZZZZ]

Opprinnelig skrevet av TRethehedgehog:

Fallout says yes

But there won’t be much to live for afterwards

fallout plays in the future with super nukes that caused global radioactive wastelands.. the current average nuke cant even destroy an entire city

[MEGA MAN]

nope clearly not when even dinosaurs couldnt survive, dont be so naive! but cockroaches will do ngl. (and believe me, even if u/ we could survive that - u dont want to lol)

-> the chance is bigger to get resurrected and revived by aliens in 50 trillion years when u hide your teeth somewhere in a box lol

but maybe the temple on the himalaya could survive it, or maybe certain islands like hawaii

[Hobbit XIII]

Opprinnelig skrevet av sfnhltb:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Kat:

do you think humans would be able to survive a nuclear war and a nuclear winter?

Yes to the nuclear war, plenty of places wouldn't be targeted even in the worst case scenarios. And nuclear winter is long since debunked (since the early 1990s at the latest).

there is always somebody that needs to be told they are wrong on the internet!

Dr Richard Wolfson disagrees with you.

[sfnhltb]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Hobbit XIII:

Opprinnelig skrevet av sfnhltb:

Yes to the nuclear war, plenty of places wouldn't be targeted even in the worst case scenarios. And nuclear winter is long since debunked (since the early 1990s at the latest).

there is always somebody that needs to be told they are wrong on the internet!

Dr Richard Wolfson disagrees with you.

Is he one of the idiots that still writes scientific papers that pretend most modern cities are still mostly made of wood because otherwise his nonsensical tripe wouldn't work?

[MEGA MAN]

in the world i see . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZMUGlFI_tg

[vkobe]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Hobbit XIII:

Opprinnelig skrevet av vkobe:

they restrict it, because they fear about radiation, than the bomber is not able to escape the blast, than the blast going to break glass in important cities in russia like Murmansk

reason is the design is supposed to use uranium 238 shell, but they prefer to replace with lead, because uranium 238 go fission+thermonulear explosion=a good radiation fallout

but tsar bomba didnt have enough nuclear fusion fuel to go above 100 megaton

Without being rude, stop talking to me!
I already said the reference of it moving the Earth has been retracted probably some time ago. by looks of it.

I am now looking up about Ceasar Romero to do with another thread.

sorry if you are too bad to understand energy concept, how nuke work and how massive is earth

the guy is right when he said our nuke are only firecracker, if you want big boom check super volcano or asteroid crash

tambora is not super volcano but its explosion in 1815 is already at level of all our nuke in 1984

so tambora is your answer how nuclear war would be if we used all our nukes in 1984

[isomorphic_projection]

I'm not human, i ain't even here.

[Hobbit XIII]

Opprinnelig skrevet av vkobe:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Hobbit XIII:

Without being rude, stop talking to me!
I already said the reference of it moving the Earth has been retracted probably some time ago. by looks of it.

I am now looking up about Ceasar Romero to do with another thread.

sorry if you are too bad to understand energy concept, how nuke work and how massive is earth

the guy is right when he said our nuke are only firecracker, if you want big boom check super volcano or asteroid crash

tambora is not super volcano but its explosion in 1815 is already at level of all our nuke in 1984

so tambora is your answer how nuclear war would be if we used all our nukes in 1984

It is not that you just keep going on and on about something I already said more or less retracted to.

and I am happy with the Dr Richard Wolfson summing up.

Opprinnelig skrevet av sfnhltb:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Hobbit XIII:

there is always somebody that needs to be told they are wrong on the internet!

Dr Richard Wolfson disagrees with you.

Is he one of the idiots that still writes scientific papers that pretend most modern cities are still mostly made of wood because otherwise his nonsensical tripe wouldn't work?

you can take it up with him yourself.

Opprinnelig skrevet av "whats your fav. scary movie?":

in the world i see . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZMUGlFI_tg

I really hope that is a link to Credence Clearwater Revival 'Bad Moon Rising' .

-I spammed enough here now.

[[TGSA] oujisan2236]

Yes

its mostly the northern Hemisphere that has Nukes and has an issue with their neighbors

the rest of us will hardly feel it to be damn honest wit you

[vkobe]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Hobbit XIII:

Opprinnelig skrevet av vkobe:

sorry if you are too bad to understand energy concept, how nuke work and how massive is earth

the guy is right when he said our nuke are only firecracker, if you want big boom check super volcano or asteroid crash

tambora is not super volcano but its explosion in 1815 is already at level of all our nuke in 1984

so tambora is your answer how nuclear war would be if we used all our nukes in 1984

It is not that you just keep going on and on about something I already said more or less retracted to.

and I am happy with the Dr Richard Wolfson summing up.

Opprinnelig skrevet av sfnhltb:

Is he one of the idiots that still writes scientific papers that pretend most modern cities are still mostly made of wood because otherwise his nonsensical tripe wouldn't work?

you can take it up with him yourself.

Opprinnelig skrevet av "whats your fav. scary movie?":

in the world i see . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZMUGlFI_tg

I really hope that is a link to Credence Clearwater Revival 'Bad Moon Rising' .

-I spammed enough here now.

lol sorry dude if you think nuke=death star XD

look our nuke are strong, but not this strong

again inform yourself about tambora eruption in 1815 it is closest thing to a nuclear winter with all nuclear arsenal in 1984

[Hobbit XIII]

Opprinnelig skrevet av vkobe:

Opprinnelig skrevet av Hobbit XIII:

It is not that you just keep going on and on about something I already said more or less retracted to.

and I am happy with the Dr Richard Wolfson summing up.





you can take it up with him yourself.




I really hope that is a link to Credence Clearwater Revival 'Bad Moon Rising' .

-I spammed enough here now.

lol sorry dude if you think nuke=death star XD

look our nuke are strong, but not this strong

again inform yourself about tambora eruption in 1815 it is closest thing to a nuclear winter with all nuclear arsenal in 1984

and yet even though i said yep already said yep and said again yep all retracted you spam me yet again.

[De Hollandse Ezel]

I not believe in evolution. but if you do :

that dino astroid impacted with 72 terraton

there are about 12500 nuclear warheads in the world. (not all are working as some need their detonator replaced and many are loose warheads so not mounted on a rocket.

the biggest ones of those have a blast of 25Mton.
but most are a lot weaker and in the kton ramge.

for those 12500 bukes together are only 6300 Mton.

or less than a millionth of that dino astroidm

still even if all 12500 were tsar bombas at their max 100 Mton
that all those nukes combined are just 1.25Terraton. still just 1.7% of that dinoastroid

hence why the effect of nukes is far more local and the nuclear winter woulf only last a decade.
humams woulf survive.

[Awaken]

OP nukes are fake, stop spreading fear mongering propaganda.
Here educate yourself: https://vimeo.com/331671526