Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
If it´s non-competitive the alternative version would be to measure Your fun with the game. And competitive would be Your performance vs the others, or the fun with it anyway.
Is there no inbetween? Fun is good but I also want something to help me improve my game but find some sites too much. Found Liquipedia for example - alot of data and terrible UI/UX.
I´m unsure how analyzing data helps to improve the game. Usually playing helps improving it - and with time You get a feeling where You can improve, or what You´re good at. Ultimately the best test might be playing competitive, else You only compete Yourself, as it is still competitive when You want to have data about Your gameplay.
In other words, the answer is probably "none" :-)