Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
If it´s non-competitive the alternative version would be to measure Your fun with the game. And competitive would be Your performance vs the others, or the fun with it anyway.
Is there no inbetween? Fun is good but I also want something to help me improve my game but find some sites too much. Found Liquipedia for example - alot of data and terrible UI/UX.
I´m unsure how analyzing data helps to improve the game. Usually playing helps improving it - and with time You get a feeling where You can improve, or what You´re good at. Ultimately the best test might be playing competitive, else You only compete Yourself, as it is still competitive when You want to have data about Your gameplay.
In other words, the answer is probably "none" :-)