安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-channel_memory_architecture
There is a difference in PCI-E slots with their bandwidth, but much of that bandwidth is not fully utilized to even cause a bottleneck. All of which are universal. Just look at AMD's new R9 cards with no crossfire bridge required, the bandwidth is taken directly from the slot. 3.0 is recommended when in crossfire and so forth on high end cards, but it's negligible.
and 8 in quad mode
they need to be installed in matched pairs using the same colored slots
set at the same speeds/timings/voltage
pcie 3.0 has twice the bandwidth of pcie 2.0
3.0 x8+x8 = 2.0 x16+x16