安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-channel_memory_architecture
There is a difference in PCI-E slots with their bandwidth, but much of that bandwidth is not fully utilized to even cause a bottleneck. All of which are universal. Just look at AMD's new R9 cards with no crossfire bridge required, the bandwidth is taken directly from the slot. 3.0 is recommended when in crossfire and so forth on high end cards, but it's negligible.
and 8 in quad mode
they need to be installed in matched pairs using the same colored slots
set at the same speeds/timings/voltage
pcie 3.0 has twice the bandwidth of pcie 2.0
3.0 x8+x8 = 2.0 x16+x16