Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
1080p 60hz display does not take much of a cpu or gpu to do that
CS2 - average 300+
Valorant 400+
It's not a hot take or shocking development that low end hardware is enough for e-sports titles like CS2, Valorant, Apex, etc. with respectable framerates. Those games are made to run that way.
unigine haven is like a 15 year old benchmark lmao
This is why gaming consoles ship with low-end hardware yet are still able to achieve acceptable gaming performance.
One example is my computer. I'm using a 12600k, a $160 CPU and I get easily 120fps in every game. I don't need more because my display is only 120hz.
My Rx 6700 was only $259 brand new. I got starfield premium edition free with it.
My PC is just one huge, gigantic gaming bargain.
It's always the new computer people getting the i-9 and rtx 4090. There's no value at all in the top end. There's no value in new parts.
Honestly, the only i9- that is even remotely interesting is the i9-10900. That's the only i9 people should be getting. That or the i9-10850 is another good one.
I would have bought the i9-10900 if my 12600k wasn't so cheap.
I'd say even ryzen 5 3600X should be good enough for such low end GPU like the 1660 Super 6gb
the 5600X is good enough for up to rtx 3070 / rtx 2080Ti if you dont play competitive shooters