Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
1080p 60hz display does not take much of a cpu or gpu to do that
CS2 - average 300+
Valorant 400+
It's not a hot take or shocking development that low end hardware is enough for e-sports titles like CS2, Valorant, Apex, etc. with respectable framerates. Those games are made to run that way.
unigine haven is like a 15 year old benchmark lmao
This is why gaming consoles ship with low-end hardware yet are still able to achieve acceptable gaming performance.
One example is my computer. I'm using a 12600k, a $160 CPU and I get easily 120fps in every game. I don't need more because my display is only 120hz.
My Rx 6700 was only $259 brand new. I got starfield premium edition free with it.
My PC is just one huge, gigantic gaming bargain.
It's always the new computer people getting the i-9 and rtx 4090. There's no value at all in the top end. There's no value in new parts.
Honestly, the only i9- that is even remotely interesting is the i9-10900. That's the only i9 people should be getting. That or the i9-10850 is another good one.
I would have bought the i9-10900 if my 12600k wasn't so cheap.
I'd say even ryzen 5 3600X should be good enough for such low end GPU like the 1660 Super 6gb
the 5600X is good enough for up to rtx 3070 / rtx 2080Ti if you dont play competitive shooters