安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
CSM means UEFI but also compatible with BIOS. Not all devices and software supports UEFI. You are choosing between having both or just having one.
Faster boot and better power management.2 This is especially true for Windows – depending on various factors, UEFI with Fast Boot can be even twice as fast as legacy boot. With Linux the difference will be smaller, but still present. This is because BIOS-booted OS needs to re-initialize some hardware that might have been already initialized, the initial OS code needs to be loaded in very slow legacy modes, etc.
https://superuser.com/questions/1113786/should-i-install-an-os-using-uefi-or-bios-legacy-csm-boot-mode/1113787
I forget to mention the fastboot.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-legacy-mode-in-BIOS-What-is-the-difference-between-legacy-and-UEFI-Is-it-safe-to-use-legacy-mode
A fun talk between uefi and legacy.
If I were to Coreboot my motherboard it would post a lot faster then that same board with it's stock firmware and UEFI.