Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
CSM means UEFI but also compatible with BIOS. Not all devices and software supports UEFI. You are choosing between having both or just having one.
Faster boot and better power management.2 This is especially true for Windows – depending on various factors, UEFI with Fast Boot can be even twice as fast as legacy boot. With Linux the difference will be smaller, but still present. This is because BIOS-booted OS needs to re-initialize some hardware that might have been already initialized, the initial OS code needs to be loaded in very slow legacy modes, etc.
https://superuser.com/questions/1113786/should-i-install-an-os-using-uefi-or-bios-legacy-csm-boot-mode/1113787
I forget to mention the fastboot.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-legacy-mode-in-BIOS-What-is-the-difference-between-legacy-and-UEFI-Is-it-safe-to-use-legacy-mode
A fun talk between uefi and legacy.
If I were to Coreboot my motherboard it would post a lot faster then that same board with it's stock firmware and UEFI.