Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
CSM means UEFI but also compatible with BIOS. Not all devices and software supports UEFI. You are choosing between having both or just having one.
Faster boot and better power management.2 This is especially true for Windows – depending on various factors, UEFI with Fast Boot can be even twice as fast as legacy boot. With Linux the difference will be smaller, but still present. This is because BIOS-booted OS needs to re-initialize some hardware that might have been already initialized, the initial OS code needs to be loaded in very slow legacy modes, etc.
https://superuser.com/questions/1113786/should-i-install-an-os-using-uefi-or-bios-legacy-csm-boot-mode/1113787
I forget to mention the fastboot.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-legacy-mode-in-BIOS-What-is-the-difference-between-legacy-and-UEFI-Is-it-safe-to-use-legacy-mode
A fun talk between uefi and legacy.
If I were to Coreboot my motherboard it would post a lot faster then that same board with it's stock firmware and UEFI.