GTX 1060 3gb vs RX470 4gb

[InfinityJosh]

1060 has more power but 470 more vram


1920x1080p high settings fxaa
I would take for 3 years

[Cathulhu]

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-6GB-vs-AMD-RX-470/3639vs3640
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-3GB-vs-AMD-RX-470/3646vs3640

Personally, i'd get the 1060 6GB, which is more future proof.

[InfinityJosh]

new 60 series from NVIDIA is a lot more expensive than previous one and 760, at least 6 gb.

[Cathulhu]

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-960-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1060-6GB/3165vs3639
It's also quite a lot faster, almost twice as fast as a 960.

[Untitled]

Rx 480 nitro+ 4gb is a good option for only $339 aud it will run faster than both of those cards

[davidlowe84]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dixie Normous:

Rx 480 nitro+ 4gb is a good option for only $339 aud it will run faster than both of those cards

The GTX 1060 beats RX 480

[vadim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Infinity Josh:

1060 has more power but 470 more vram

GTX 1060 3GB significally faster than RX 470. Now and almost for certain always will be.
You will not be able to play some future game at ultra settings, but neither RX 470 nor GTX 1060 3GB (no even GTX 1060 6GB/R9 Fury X) will not have enough power to run these games at max settings and acceptable framerate. You will simply run at "very high" in the future. No big deal.

[Aliquis Freedom & Ethnopluralism]

For plenty of games the 3 GB isn't an issue. With older versions of the Geforce cards the lower memory cards wasn't really an advantage either.

I know lots of people say the 6 GB version but I haven't really seen the benchmarks which make them right.

RX 480 and GTX 1060 is closer now than before but you say the 470 .. I don't know. 470 over 1050Ti at-least.

[Digital Nautilus]

if your psu is up to the task the R9 Fury is on sale on newegg for $260 and $20 off that with a rebate.

[Yanderia]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Infinity Josh:

1060 has more power but 470 more vram


1920x1080p high settings fxaa
I would take for 3 years

1060 wins, but it's nvidia... I dunno they like to milk their fans, amd just can't keep up that's all

[Yanderia]

I have an rx480, it's sexy, its fast, its amd, but nvidia is faster but their markup is ridicilous

[dukdo]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย davidlowe84:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Dixie Normous:

Rx 480 nitro+ 4gb is a good option for only $339 aud it will run faster than both of those cards

The GTX 1060 beats RX 480

At this point not by that much. And in 2 years I'd expect both the RX 470 and 480 to out perform their equivilent Nvidia cards.

[BoNfiRe]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย davidlowe84:

The GTX 1060 beats RX 480

Only just, and only in DX11 games. DX12 is the future, and the RX 480 is around 15 to 25% faster, which is quite a bit.

[vadim]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย plz volvo plz:

At this point not by that much. And in 2 years I'd expect both the RX 470 and 480 to out perform their equivilent Nvidia cards.

Well, I expect just the opposite. And who of us is right?

[Ralf]

Get the gimped Novideo 3GB 1060 and be happy that you won't get the same FPS in the same games after a year or two cuz Gimpworks®

[upcoast]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย DaddyBeee:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย davidlowe84:

The GTX 1060 beats RX 480

Only just, and only in DX11 games. DX12 is the future, and the RX 480 is around 15 to 25% faster, which is quite a bit.

I agree ^.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review-9.html

Rx480 has six wins out of 8 games in Vulkan/DX12 significantly more than the 1060 6GB that only manages 2 wins out of 8 games ^.