Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-3GB-vs-AMD-RX-470/3646vs3640
Personally, i'd get the 1060 6GB, which is more future proof.
It's also quite a lot faster, almost twice as fast as a 960.
You will not be able to play some future game at ultra settings, but neither RX 470 nor GTX 1060 3GB (no even GTX 1060 6GB/R9 Fury X) will not have enough power to run these games at max settings and acceptable framerate. You will simply run at "very high" in the future. No big deal.
I know lots of people say the 6 GB version but I haven't really seen the benchmarks which make them right.
RX 480 and GTX 1060 is closer now than before but you say the 470 .. I don't know. 470 over 1050Ti at-least.
Only just, and only in DX11 games. DX12 is the future, and the RX 480 is around 15 to 25% faster, which is quite a bit.
I agree ^.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review-9.html
Rx480 has six wins out of 8 games in Vulkan/DX12 significantly more than the 1060 6GB that only manages 2 wins out of 8 games ^.