Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1060-3GB-vs-AMD-RX-470/3646vs3640
Personally, i'd get the 1060 6GB, which is more future proof.
It's also quite a lot faster, almost twice as fast as a 960.
You will not be able to play some future game at ultra settings, but neither RX 470 nor GTX 1060 3GB (no even GTX 1060 6GB/R9 Fury X) will not have enough power to run these games at max settings and acceptable framerate. You will simply run at "very high" in the future. No big deal.
I know lots of people say the 6 GB version but I haven't really seen the benchmarks which make them right.
RX 480 and GTX 1060 is closer now than before but you say the 470 .. I don't know. 470 over 1050Ti at-least.
Only just, and only in DX11 games. DX12 is the future, and the RX 480 is around 15 to 25% faster, which is quite a bit.
I agree ^.
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/73945-gtx-1060-vs-rx-480-updated-review-9.html
Rx480 has six wins out of 8 games in Vulkan/DX12 significantly more than the 1060 6GB that only manages 2 wins out of 8 games ^.