Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
Everything can be abused, I doubt a group of people are following you around just to give you a thumbs down.
People also need to know if their stuff is disliked, it helps them to realize what is and isn't liked by the community. Thus they can work on it and make it better.
There are no negative rewards that carry any weight, and even if they added it then that means you'd have pay the person who made the workshop item in points to leave then a negative mark. Something that makes absoultely no sense at all.
Heck it would encourage people to make crap items just so people would give them points telling others its crap.
That doesn't help separate good Worshop mods from the bad one though and that is what the up/down system is intended for.
Yes, there will be some abuse. That is natural as people will always abuse something in some way. With the removal of down being displayed, it is far less abused though.
A good mod will always be voted up and ranked higher then the downvoters abusing the system can compensate for.
Awards can not be a replacement for the current system.
E: also the thumbs up and thumbs down are used to calculate a 5 star average. I wouldn't want to be the one who has to somehow code how that is supposed to make sense with awards.
But that is not what is happening, some users are using it to harass someone with whom they lost an argument with on a game forum and got a warning from a moderator or banned from the forums. I see this quite often on my Steam workshop.
I know you can't please everyone and I am not going to try to but if they using it for revenge and harassment it should be changed to something that prohibits this kind of behavior to use it for revenge and harassment. That's all I'm saying.
Ignore them. I know I do. They want the reaction.
There is no way to really tell why someone downvoted a workshop item, so there is no way for Valve to tell if it was harassment or revenge. Even if it is, like I said, a good mod will have far more upvoted then the user could make downvotes to counter.
There is no way to prevent that. Steam can't magically read the mind of the person leaving the rating to know if they are leaving it because they don't like it or if because they don't like the person.
If a handful of users are indeed doing that then feel free to report the users and it can be looked at by support.
Charging people to leave negative reviews will never happen
I mean if you suspect a user of doing it you can always report them and Valve can investigate. If that user for instance marked down every single item someone did that is a big flag, but that is for support to worry about.
But how do you know they didn't just not like the mod, even then?
Even if they think the user did abuse, is it a big enough issue to do anything about a single user or a handful vs many more that may like the mod? Is it worth doing anything about?
As long as there's users involved, users will do things you don't like. No matter how much you sterilize the system, any opportunity for user interaction carries that risk. At some point though you can leave your system an unappealing husk trying to micromanage users to oblivion. And that has more undesirable long term consequences than dealing with a few malcontents directly.
You could do analytics, like if they only mark down items from certain people and mark down all their items across multiple games for instance.
Again though, no idea if they WOULD investigate, just that would be the only way to really tell.