安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Should we consider Black Mirror: Bandersnatch a game then? Why not just label every interactive DVD or bluray menus as a game considering how some of them have secret easter eggs if you click on the correct button? Ironically, those menus are far more interactive than visual novels.
Well, if that's the case, how about interactive YouTube videos that play out a "Choose Your Own Adventure" narrative, linking other videos as part of the "choices"? Should that kind of interactive fiction be considered a game too?
There have been games like that, yes.
A chose your own adventure is still a game, so yes, those would still be games.
My wife played the Walking Dead. It required quick decision making and reflexes at times, so yes, that would still be a game.
A book and movies are strait out, pre-determined with no real interaction and no choices. Far different from having the decision to choose left or right that creates a difference in the story.
-----
VNs are still classified as games. Even consoles have had them for a long time, at least in Japan. They required interaction and decision making as well as often contain or are puzzles in themselves.
As I said many years ago, before this was necro'd:
Yes.
One of the definitions is "has at least one win- or loss-state". the other definition is "past time activity".