安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
block only means they cannot talk to you, it does not stop them from looking at you.
"Users only" made no sense, because Steam accounts are free.
"Friends of Friends" made also no sense because of the volatile friending behavior of people. it was easy to be friend of a friend.
as for OPs suggestion "Private for Blocked Users" ... Steam accounts are free, so that is no hindrance. blocking works only on account-basis, there is no viable method to block people.
so the suggestion is valid, also wuddih doesn't really know why these states were phased out, as valve rarely ever comments on why, it is fair to assume a plausible cause but that does not make it a fact.
one can only say valve, decided they were not needed or they simply were neglected as the client progressed in development.
the blocking of an account may or may not be something one would personally use but that does not mean it is not a good suggestion that blocked users, would see your account with a red label "blocked" or "private".
Friends of friends is a fair suggestion. Every other social client out there does this. It’s also handy for people who are organising matches and want their friend to add you to friends to make life easier.
(just because these functions/code are not being used doesn't make them bad, it just means they are not being used or they have been neglected.)