Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They can't reset achievements for game they did not make. Developers of those game must add that feature.
This also sounds kind of petty.
Not entirely certain what you mean by "petty." If you cheat in a game, does it not make sense to punish the person for it? At that point it's likely that they don't deserve the "achievements" they have, hence the name, so why not revoke them? I understand that that power may lie in the hands of the game devs, but I believe it's still a good idea for games that run VAC, the most popular of which are VALVe games.
I get that it's relatively difficult to curb something like SAM, especially when it's sometimes impossible to distinguish between somebody who cheated their achievements and somebody who just played in offline mode, but it still just kind of annoys me. It's a bit of a tease. What's the point of having achievements if people can just cheat to get them in the first place?
Now read the reply CJ HUNTER gave about SAM.
That is why achievements are basically meaningless to a portion of the userbase.
But they don't, all that matters to me is that I achieved X, if some idiot cheated it I don't care.
I earned my bragging rights anyway.