安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I've got loads of games that have completely ballsed up playtimes. Partly because back in the day I had an internet issue that BT would never fix that caused random drop outs. It wrecked Steam's playtimes.
I have plenty of games I've sunk hours and hours into and it only shows a few. Conversely I've got games (usually from bundles) that I've merely donwloaded and checked once and instead of about 10 minutes played, it lists hours.
So yes, as ReBoot rightly points out about as important as being an influencer.
You miss the point.
YOU might seem it's important, but the reality is that OBJECTIVELY it ain't. Not just to people and the effect that it has (or rather doesn't) but to Valve. As this is a thing that has existed for as many years as I can remember and remains unaddressed.
If it were therefore important to many then the forum here would be regularly lit up with it, and it simply ain't.
You get the occasional post every now and then with people questioning it, and the vast majority of them go "Oh fair enough, no worries then".
Because it ISN'T important as it serves no real use.
Look buddy, nobody's claiming this to be fine. It is a bug, we all agree on that. Just tune down on that drama, please.
Back in the day though it was more common and seemed to dwell on whether your connection dropped out.
It's why you can look at loads of software and games and find spelling mistakes and grammatical errors that never get addressed because it simply ain't worth it.
You're still missing the point entirely.
Nobody sais it doesn't exist. We have detailed HOW it exists.
The point is it does and it's not important. You are absolutely free to report it, but we are euqally doing the right thing in telling you it ain't likely to be addressed as it OBJECTIVELY isn't important as it's existed for years.
Nothing changes this.
In Utopia it all would work perfectly. But this isn't Utopia and the Valve developers who focus on Steam decide on their own priorities.
There are things on the Steam platform that sure as hell need to be fixed and that seem to not be a priority either, imo best that those get handled before they focus on a playtime counter.
Yeah but you wishing to have things perfect is irrational and isn't going to happen - that's the point.
Valve have Steam and it was originally created as a means to deliver their own games. A small scale thing. It grew organically due to demand. They had to cope to go along with this.
And now it's a platform that deals with not only thousands of games and devs and publishers with different goals, but hundreds of millions of users around the world, also with different goals, desires, means, and circumstances. Some of which completely OPPOSE one another.
So you CANNOT possibly have perfection.
The fact remains that what YOU deem as this problem mattering to you has been demonstrated as not important to them or very many people at all.
Here, you've taken this discussion into a subjective direction. Let's agree on NOT going into any subjective/personal business directions here, let's a gree on discussing the bug by itself, shall we?