Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
YOU ARE LITERALLY BUYING SOMETHING THAT MAY NEVER BE COMPLETED.
You signed a CONTRACT the second you bought the game.
Rendering any complaint about Fraud NULL AND VOID.
In a court of law.
Good grief.
A contract makes it clear exactly what Early Access is.
Games don't have to get removed from Early Access because they stopped being worked on.
No one can claim otherwise.
Although alot of people also abuse the EA stuff. Look at stomping grounds. The developer just took the money and ran. I found several games that also have done this. If the developer does not work on a game 2 years after it is released and it is still in EA, you can consider it abadoned. Stomping Lands is a good example of this.
There are exceptions. For example. Fugl is like 7 years old and still in EA as far as i know, and is still being worked on. Probably one person is working on it in their spare time or something.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/643810/Fugl/
Ill probably buy it once it is out of EA.
Still, since i been burned already, i refuse to buy any games in early development anymore.
Also, one more advice OP. If the developer is a indie developer and makes a roadmap for things to make in one year, they won't do it. Usually that is a lie. If it shows multiple years, it is more believable, but be careful, this also could be a false trick. Even triple A studios have tried this trick.
Please use the search funtction and you'll see how many posts people have done saying the same thing for years.
The error you've made though is thinking that when you buy Early Acess you're buying a finished game or the eventual finished game. YOU ARE NOT.
As the big blue box explains, you're buying in to helping an experience, and the CHANCE that a full game might be made.
How you should treat these games is very simple - jump in when and only when it's at a state where it already does what you want out of it.
Or stay clear.
Oh and no, it most definitely is NOT fraud. That's not what fraud is at all. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Valve do not impose a time limit on length of time between updates, nor do they specify how many updates a game must have. There are several Early Access games that have gone a year+ between patches, that does not make them fraudulent.