Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
why spend so much time complaining about something you can ignore?
see how useless the question is?
anyways, nobody is going to remove the rewards becase you think that they are busted
people enjoy them, even if you don't
There is others across the forums discussing how meaningless the awards are. Hitman 3 VR winning "Game of the Year" this year has made it a total mockery.
I've never seen any of the awards winners mention they're a Steam Awards winner in their own marketing (There's a Steam placed banner right now on the store page, because they're just awarded)
We've had people on these forums trying to 'elevate' the Steam Awards to Oscars level of importance, when it's just a little funny activity for users to scan the store for games.
I think we'd have less threads like this one if Steam had stuck with the funny categories they had for the first awards. They set the tone far better than the actual run-of-the-mill ones and set them apart from every other generic 'game awards'.
Now people see 'GAME OF THE YEAR AWARD' and think we're at the Nobel awards ceremony.
However, nobody really takes Steam Awards seriously, so I don't think it should matter too much. I just ignore them tbh.
Exactly, go back to making it fun. Valve gave away SteamDecks every minute to entice people to watch the Game Awards 2022 live stream, then branded the Steam Awards exactly the same.
If its supposed to be fun, make it fun. It's almost like they had some ulterior motive this year..
Now let's scrap the whole idea because you didn't like it.
No, have you played Hitman 3 VR? It's an absolute joke. It isn't even playable. It's probably the worst VR game made by a AAA studio ever in the history of VR gaming. And it won VR Game of the Year.
Each year, people who got involved, thought they were getting involved because everybody who voted, joined in to pick their favourite games and the results looked legitimate.
The branding was fun and it didn't take itself seriously.
This year, a game that is broken and is a running joke in its own community, has won Game of The year. This has pointed out the flaws in the Steam Awards. And proved to us all it's just a farce.
If it's supposed to be fun, make it fun.
If it's going to be serious. Make it serious and stop giving trading cards and XP away to entice people to vote randomly.
Show us we can vote and let us join in if we want to.
Or make it fun and give us funny categories..
Valve need to either make it serious or fun..
I didn't like that many TGA show winners this year or any year for that matter. But the feeling doesn't last long and you just move on to the next thing.
You can always create your own list of best 2022 games and share it here or your profile.
There's hundreds of well off Developers that are gonna get together every year in a big swanky theatre type building with all the glitter and glam the like you've seen in Holly Wood.
Now try stop it.
Problem solved.
Steam Awards does not really try to be anything. it is 4 weeks of user voting, the most popularity at this time, wins.
That's my exact point, if it's not going to be a reflection of the steam community's views. Why not save millions of peoples time, money and electricity bill and just randomly generate the winners anyway?
Why even have a vote in the first place?
If you are saying to people, you have never played any of these VR games because you don't have a VR headset, but just pick one to win the Trading card/XP.
All you end up with is a user generated random number generator.
So when it says: "The VR Game of the Year isn't merely masquerading as regular reality. This game improves on reality, taking advantage of the medium of VR and pushing the boundaries of the virtual realm."
Its all lies.
When it should say: "The VR Game of the Year was picked at random by people who don't have a VR headset, who simply wanted a free trading card during the Steam sale"
Pretty much this.
Also, it's funny how some people mock Metacritic because you can review games that you haven't played, while Steam lets you vote for games you haven't played as well...
You may be overstating the cost of the whole event by a large margin.
In a word? Engagement.
Steam Events are designed to drive engagement with the site. Hence why Steam tasks users with stuff like playing a game they've voted, write a review for it or scout the store for games to vote.
You're all giving too much importance to what at their core are user-engagement driven events.