Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
Then it is more likely to get taxes, then made illegal.
If you want laws against cheating in a game, then I suggest contacting your government representative and pleading the case there.
Currently the laws make cheating a civil case, not a criminal one, as it only breaks the TOS/SSA/Agreement with the game/service.
Valve, and other developers, do what they can to prevent and ban cheaters, but there is only so much they can do. They are restricted by morals and privacy rights, something cheat makers are not worried about. Developers can only ever play catch-up as well. If they try to be pro-active, many innocent people are also banned along with actual cheaters.
However, cheating in online games should definitely be illegal.
On the bright side, at least you can be sued for cheating.
Cheating in a videogame leading to prison is an absolutely absurd idea.
That just seems grossly exaggerated. You can't throw astronomical numbers like these around without a source. Some cheater claiming, their cheats sell for 40+ bucks is not a reliable source, in case you want to link to that "interview with a cheater" video.
Edit: Typos.
Quite simply: Anti cheat sucks. There is no game that has some kind of Anti Cheat system, in which cannot be cheated. The bigger the game, the more intrusive the Anti Cheat, the more cheaters. It's almost as if Anti Cheat is having the opposite effect.
Between VAC, EAC and BattlEye, cheaters have never had it easier to go ahead and ♥♥♥♥ up other peoples good time. Sure, plenty of cheaters do get interrupted, but anyone who pays for their cheats will easily get by, and meanwhile a lot of legit players who do not cheat are bothered by the different anti cheat systems in different ways.
My own personal experience with that is how I always get kicked out of CS:GO after ~20-90 minutes, by VAC, as apparently something interrupted the connection to VAC, or something. Tried all solutions, nothing works and thousands of people are suffering from this, with no reason or explanation as to why, or a way to fix it.
Then there are plenty of stories of legit players getting banned by Anti Cheat.
So, if Anti Cheat is unable to properly identify people who do cheat, and in fact identifies people who do not cheat, as cheaters, how is this going to work in court? Sure, sometimes we can have actual physical evidence someone cheater, when for example in an e-sports tournament the doofus shows the cheat app to all watchers (Accidentally or not) but other than that there's gonna be no way to ever incriminate someone.
All that said, perhaps it just being illegal is enough to disincentivize a good lot of em, which would help...
If license is broken then there comes the ban and that's enough. You've written that you have to spend more time on acquiring gear, in my opinion, that's not true, nobody forces you to do that(I hope so?), you're not 'enslaved'(I hope so?), you're completely free to do anything you want in your free time(I hope so?).
It was up to you to get to know what game do you buy before buying it, I know that what I'm writing here is irritating but there is something you can do, you can stop playing it(if you wish), and play gazilions of other games, inform other people about cheaters in game publicly(with a proof of course).
It seems like you're going out of your way to "not understand" what the OP means, by taking things out of context and/or too literal.
Yes, what you are writing is irritating, and nothing else. It's a futile post.
Who goes after a cheat creator if it is in a jurisdiction where it is not an offence? Russia for example?
And with CSGO cheaters claiming they have $10k in skins and loot boxes it should be as well, but in the grand scheme of law breaking it is at best fraud, probably minor.
Most police forces struggle to deal with murder/arson and other serious crimes, minor ones outside of organised crime aren't going to have the time/money/resources wasted.
It's down to the owners of the IP to protect and if they don't then you have your answer.
Simple - because it ain't that big a thing in the grand scheme of things. The things that are illegal are generally things that SERIOUSLY affect society to the negative. This doesn't.
Now, as in certain parts of Asia, you could lobby your government to get something done, but because of the reason I just said, don't be expecting it to happen.
In any case, even if it were made illegal, it would likely only be a civil case and not criminal. Which means in that case, the best that could be done to an offender is them being taken to court via civil action. Not arrested.
Don't take this the wrong way, I agree with you as I wish it was taken more seriously and would result in lawsuits and fines to hopefully scare many individuals from cheating and ruining online gaming, but unfortunately for now, we have to rely on anti-cheat software and developers to keep their game servers legit... which is damn near impossible for extremely popular games with millions of gamers like Call of Duty and others....
It'd largely be fruitless in so many cases anyway. The nature of online gaming is international. If someone cheats say, in Eastern Europe, Valve can't do ♥♥♥♥ about it. They do not have jurisdiction. They COULD bother to track down a legal representative in whatever country the offence happened, but they'd also have to track WHO the person was, which might be impossible from a mere IP address.
In short, being illegal is only the first step. Actually being able to enforce is the kicker here.