Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
The handsome collection usually has a discount on Steam too, which amounts to the same price as on Epic.
How do people like this get on in the actual real world? Whenever I see posts from people who don't understand how basic purchasing and shops work, I always wonder "how the hell do you buy your food?"
It boggles my mind.
This is a good example of how transparency can confuse people. Not everyone can understand all the extra information provided.
And people say they want transparency, but issues like this are what turn companies away from it.
https://www.epicgames.com/store/en-US/bundles/borderlands-the-handsome-collection
That's the "real" handsome collection. You could buy that anywhere except from Steam. I bought it to my ps4 last summer, and last month you could get it free from epic. But you see it includes all the same items as the so-called "Handsome Collection" that steam has. Except that it cost's 200€ less than the steam version. Because it's not an bundle, and I do understand it. What I don't understand is how they can sell something for so much if you could get it the same from elsewhere for a lot cheaper. But apparently there are no laws preventing it from happening, and it seems that many people don't also see anything wrong it in either. It's just really greedy in my books, but hey, if you want to spend 235€ for a bunch of games you could get for 60€, be my guest. Also yes I can see there's an sale right now, but the sale will end in two weeks and if the price goes back to 235€ it is a rip off. Sorry, but it just is.
Agreed.
Both are the real one and contain all the same things.
Steam just breaks it down for you. It is also the developer who creates such bundles.
And you keep missing the point. The 235€ is if you bought them all separately and not on sale. The bundle is discounted by 85% to about 35€.
Not only that, it is a dynamic bundle on Steam, so if you own parts of it already, then that cost is removed from the bundle, where as on Epic, you pay the full amount, regardless.
You seem not to understand that the bundle is NEVER 235€, that's just the price of the individual pieces of it. The bundle is ALWAYS discounted.
Good point, especially as certain consumers seem to LOVE to complain about anything in order to try and get some leverage.
Well, you clearly don't understand it at all, because you can't compare different stores prices and arbitrarily say "this one is the real price" or something like that.
So frankly you DON'T understand how it works at all.
And yes, I bought Borderlands on PS3, got 1 and 2 free on 360, then got the Handsome Collection on PS4. The prices even before sale are wildly different in a lot of cases.
The problem you seem to be having is not just not understanding how licensing and so on works, or stores, but how budgeting and business works. If a developer/publisher spends more to create the game for a certain platform, they will often have a slightly increased price for that platform. Each version often has a different ledger for that version in their books. So as such, you will also see wildly differeing rates for sales too.
It's quite common for a game to be on one store (like say the Nintendo store) not ever get any discount, because it might not have hit their goals there, yet be repeatedly discounted on another store, like PSN.
And no, the bundle is NEVER 235. That's not what it displays. It displays that price as the TOTAL PRICE OF ALL THOSE ITEMS. That's pricing LAW and MUST be shown.
Again, something you don't understand - both in the US and here in Europe ALL discounts must list both the original price, the discount and the rate of discount.
Which is what makes the thing confusing for the OP and is actually misleading by Epic.
Well, in that case, Epic need a kick up the arse, but I'd probably have to join a long line.
I can understand that part of it then, but he really shouldn't comparing the two that way in the first place.
Yeah, but to be fair here, Epic should still have it disaplyed because as I said it's consumer law.
They absolutely must include the full price, the discounted price and the discount itself. That's pretty iron cast in law (although I'm more speaking from the law of England and Wales, as I specialised in disability and consumer law - but I'm aware US law has this bit somewhat similar).