Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Can we have an example of one of those games that doesn't work on Windows 10?
As said above there's been lengthy discussions over the subject every time an OS is dropped from support which should be avaiable through the search engine.
Only games using SecuRom won’t work as the kernel hook for it was removed. But like the only one i recall is a Sims3 DLC. There are very very few gams that don’t run. Even something like Bioshock 1 which hd some problems i functionally solved as you can just play the remastered version
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/1/2299597907723991725/#c2299597907724148354
Why can Uplay have a client for XP and Steam when it completely disables Windows 7? I don't have a single game for Windows 10.
For a while, it was definitely impossible to play games via Steam even on Windows 7?
Here Valve crossed the border. If this does not work out quickly, I will contact the EP and the EC. When they knew how to divide the railways, power plants, gas stations, airports, they can also do it with Steam. This is a huge encroachment on fundamental rights. Bequeath this to the bosses of this private company. AT&T is on its way! At least the new commission will have some success. I also know what to suggest to them.
This is why Steam offers auto-updates, because there are changes they have to do that will result in backend changes some are for security (to change the attack surface of Steam to make it more difficult for hackers, as well as to fix security issues on the client side by fixing them and then preventing people running older compromised versions), some are to enable new features, and sometimes just because on reflection the way a given thing works just isn't the right way to do it and we need to do it this way instead.
Nothing they are doing by doing these upgrades is illegal or unethical or has anything to do with your fundamental rights (you don't have the right for Steam to be open to hacking because they can't close down vulnerabilities that would break older clients).
In the past, the Valve refused a refund. GDPR is also great. I am an optimist. We have already exchanged a few messages, it will not be possible right away, but we have a similar opinion. We have a deal. I'll wait a few days, and if that doesn't work, I'll write a draft and send it to them. We also know what the proposed solutions will be.
Theyy've always had a refund policy. IAll that changed was they automated it to be less time consuming.
The solution is that you upgrade. Simple as that.
As said, you can't have Valve leaving themselves and by extension millions of users and hundreds of business partners open to risk because a few people don't wanna upgrade. Or install linux and run the game through proton.
you have to go on the big stage of subreddit r/gaming and publish your "solution" there.
i am pretty sure after what you wrote here, you will get great responses there and good high velocity claps on the back of you head.
my oldest refund on Steam was in 2010 btw.
XP is not listed on the Uplay client supported OS list:
https://support.ubisoft.com/en-us/Faqs/000018922/System-Requirements
The only way of using the client on XP is through an older and unsupported version of the client
https://support.ubisoft.com/en-us/Faqs/000026524/Uplay-PC-and-Windows-XP
Which is still possible.
It's not. Being able to game on win XP is not a fundamental right.
But since it will be part of the draft, I sacrificed time and made a record. This is what it looked like:
Microsoft Windows XP
IE8
▶️ uplay - Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage
▶️ chrome ▶️ Download chrome ▶️ version 49.0.2623.112 ▶️ working
Chrome
▶️ uplay ▶️ Download Now ▶️ UplayInstaller 113MB ▶️ Uplay 109.0 installer - The version of Windows you are using is not suppored by this application. Press OK to download a supported version of this application. ▶️ OK ▶️ automatic Downloading 56.5MB client ▶️ Uplay 23.0 Installer ▶️ Log in ▶️ working, library available
▶️ Steam ▶️ Install Steam - 1,5MB client ▶️ Steam needs to be online to update ▶️ OK ▶️ The end!
Clearly Valve arbitrarily and deliberately prevented people who had and used those games on Windows XP from using their game library. Unequivocally without reason. Only from a position of strength. Until yesterday, it was possible to use the old version. Here too, Valve took a deliberate and unequivocal step from a position of strength that actively prevented old clients from connecting, log in. There is no real excuse. It is just a demonstration of strength, arbitrariness, arrogance. Clear violation of customer rights.
I assume that Valve will have the opportunity to express himself. I wish you good luck, because Valve should be able to find out who is in the European Parliament.
The question is if Google can support XP, if Ubisoft can support XP, what a rational reason Valve is to arbitrarily restrict customers' rights because of the operating system used, on which it had previously operated and sold games. None exists.
If you try security, it is up to the customer to accept the risk. Not to the company to arbitrarily prevent him from accessing his property. As a result, Valve itself has actively prevented parts of its customers from using their assets, license, or whatever it is called.
New features? This is no reason to arbitrarily restrict fundamental rights.
Valve can repeat the same thing against Windows 7 at any time.
Unambiguously, demonstrably at any time.
Basically, I have nothing more to add. That's enough. I just have to work out a proposal for a solution, which is basically done. Then it just need to be consulted legislatively. This will be done by some organization under the European Parliament. I don't know the details here.
It's just a matter of whether Valve makes amends, or we will use the time of forced leave to solve this problem. For our part, it will be shorter, Valve will sweat. Maybe nothing will happen and the young progressive and technically educated will have a different topic.
Google stopped supporting Chrome for XP beyond Chrome 49. (Fun fact: The Steam client works under Chromium, which at the current version does not support WinXP)
Note than being able to download a previous client version that runs on a certain OS does not equate with the OS being 'supported'.