Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
How many games a user has is highly dependent on how you look at it
What about median and mode?!
Mode might be useful, but the median? Seems like a tool for rarified situations (at least in this context).
What about people with 2000 games who only play a handful (like close to a hypothetical mean of fifty or less) of them? Why exclude one group and not the other?
You're thinking of range, common mistake.
But it will give a very different population than conditions in the OP.
Wait, to what uses have you been putting medians?!
Range would be suuuuuper helpful, at that.
This to be realistic.
There are millions and millions of accounts that only have <5 games.
Many only play CSGO, DOTA 2 or Team Fortress 2.
There are a lot of these kind of accounts.
You just dont see them because those users barely post on the forums.