had nearly a decade to make a better game. They released a worst game. Like how in the world.....

CS2 had from release until Rogue Traders comes out to grab my attention. Now it's like I'm finished

Diposting pertama kali oleh JimmysTheBestCop:

Diposting pertama kali oleh briansterling81:

I had no idea of all that. Maybe I had rose-colored glasses on. Last game I bought from them was Mars I

diaries. So yeah, I expect the worst but I am also hopefull that by chrismas the game will probably in a good state (without nerfing the visual fidelity hopefully)
will magically have none of these problems. It's also a beta, there will be a day 1 patch that fixes everything blabla
- Game releases with all the announced problems
- 98 percent of the people has

DO NOT BUY THIS GAME DO NOT BUY THIS GAME
I'm glad I was able to play the game for "free" through Xbox Gamepass but at this point I don't think I will ever touch the game again due to horrible
performance and game mechanics that have utterly ruined it for me.
FYI I'm running a Ryzen 7 5800X process with an RX 7900XT, now that I've reached 180k population my CPU is pinned at 90-99% usage and the

Diposting pertama kali oleh feral:

there are other things to consider, such as the fact that the game is past its worst period. let's face it, it can't really get any worse. everyone has seen what the
game is like, some like it, some don't. most of those who didn't like it already wrote a negative review. i have found that players are more inclined to write the negative feedback as soon as possible

let's be honest - it's Paradox - the game will be DLC'd to death. At least there always is the workshop which will have a ton of good and free stuff. [/quote]
Are the radios needed to enjoy a city
building game? No.

Are the Content Creator Packs needed or even useful to anyone having access to the workshop? No.

Are all the expansions needed to enjoy the game? Not by a long shot. But let's say they

Diposting pertama kali oleh UnwantedCabbage:

I haven't played it and was wondering why I haven't seen any of my favourite youtubers play it so I looked at the reviews and they're very negative.

The game was
that something was very wrong. The first clue was that the specs for the game shot up just prior to release (in the interest of full disclosure, I requested a refund when I heard this, because my PC did

most bugs. They've grown in size had 2 successful games and multiple dlc. But they didn't learn. And maybe have gotten worst.

I now won't even look at an Owlcat game before 12 months after full release
was actually 100% playable on release. This was their first game and maybe only released that way.

Go back to the ck1 or early hoi and eu series they are bug ridden messes. As much as Vicky 2 was

delivered are bigger maps with vanilla version. But everything else is simply a fraud.

Oh well and the first DLC is quite the worst I´ve ever seen in gaming history. Price is a fourth of the basegame and has
Welp, as much as I detest PDX and CO for CS2 now I have to admit that Surviving Mars is one of my favorite games of all times. There are some very nice DLCs (ofc the first ones) and the game has a

fps with a city that is only 30k on low settings.
This game is the worst optimised game i have seen for some time.
it also does not look that great even at higher settings. The art design is more

Diposting pertama kali oleh mackster:

If you have been PC gaming for over 25 years then you should be used to this. Tho I am guessing thats not all been on PC?

PC gaming is, and always has been, a

nothing is wrong and every one else is the problem is not productive either. That may be the worst possible arrangement because then, they never know and we don't get the game they promised....which sounds

Diposting pertama kali oleh DrWonderbaum:

Yeah I don't really see what the big mystery is here. The game is at a 49% rating on Steam and the number of people experiencing performance decreases and