Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
.... people have really weird ideas about FPS, i guess the companies won out in promoting 150+ FPS gaming...
Limiting FPS has a small latency increase depending on it;s implementation, but.. no it doesn't cause stuttering unless Nvidia did a terrible job of it.
Why would it?
Stuttering is caused by inconsistency in the frame rate, which is largely due to the lack of optimisation on the developers part... it's not inherently because of how high or low the FPS is..
Try RTSS i think it's still bundled with MSI's afterburner.
Your brain is your bottleneck.
very smooth indeed! i believe @ 24fps the eye still sees a smooth picture. Any lower and it would be choppy. cars are now flying again, zipping up and down the highway. Very happy
Thats not the point though, and it's pretty obvious
30 frames with inconsistent frame timing is obviously going to be worse than 60 frames with inconsistent frame timing.. did you really need studies to help you grasp that? or just to sell home that I NEED MUH 100+ FRAMES.
Inconsistency in the frame timing is far worse than just a low FPS, but all it is ,like anything, is just pump out more frames and hope the blind won't notice..
♥♥♥♥ 100+ FPS, give me consistent frame timing... but it's easier to not bother optimising games isn't it? and just rely on the recent hardware to make up for it.